When I emceed the Colorado Right to Life March a few months back I stood on the state capitol steps and publically called on Governor Hickenlooper to shut down every abortuary in the state of Colorado and to enforce the inalienable right to life for all innocent human persons in accord with his sworn Constitutional Oath.

Of course my public plea fell on deaf ears. One would expect this from a pro-infanticide uber-liberal like Hickenlooper.

But self-professing pro-life governors like yourself should be different. And that is why I am writing to you Governor Perrry. You claim to be 100% pro-life wihtout exceptions and a supporter of Personhood legislation. You have stated publicly that life begins at conception and that nobody possesses the right to take that life since no individual state possesses the authority to alienate any inalienable right…chiefly the right to life–without which no other rights matter much.

Given these positions of yours, I call on you as chief law enforcement officer of the state of Texas to enforce the God given right to life for every pre-born baby in your state in strict accordance with your sworn constitutional oath (specifically the 14th amendment which guarantees that “no state deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of the law; nor deny any person… the equal protection of the laws.”

Since pre-born babies are obviously human persons (which you have publicly acknowledged on numerous occasions and which is a scientific and biological fact that even an atheist can attest to), you possess a solemn obligation to enforce their God given right to their own lives.

I therefore call on you, Governor Rick Perry, to enforce the God given right to life for all human persons in the state of Texas by closing down every abortion clinic in the state of Texas and prosecuting any abortion “physician” who intentionally murders any pre-born baby at any stage of their physical and biological development for any reason for murder per the Federal Constitution, your state constitution and God’s enduring commandment, “Thou Shall Not Murder.”

Praying you will do the right thing by abiding by your sworn constitutional oath to re-crimminalize child murder by enforcing the God given right to life for all innocent human persons in the state of Texas. You don’t have to wait for a constitutional amendment or any legislative action or even for the Supreme Court to “overturn” Roe v Wade (which isn’t likely to happen in the forseeable future anyhow). The 14th Amendment is already on the books and it is your DUTY and OBLIGATION to enforce it.

“no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of the law; nor deny any person… the equal protection of the laws.”

Praying you do.

For the innocent,

Gregg Jackson

I am not a scientist. But I frequently study it…especially Creation Science. To me it’s fun to see how many recent scientific discoveries point to the Biblical account of creation in Genesis (i.e. that God created the heavens and the earth by His Word around 6,000 years ago).

The bottom line is that studying Creation Science has increased my faith in the God of the Bible and that the Bible is literally true and can be trusted as the ultimate source of truth for every aspect of our lives! What a loving God we have to not want His children to be confused that He would provide a direction book for life, that if we study it, can provide the answers to any question we may have in our lives.

One of the primary resources I have used to educate myself has been Ken Ham’s Answers in Genesis Web Site which I strongly encourage you to check out.

Here are the “Top 10 Proofs That Confirm a Young Earth” from the web site. Very informative!

Many people have asked me how I know Christianity is true. As we approach Ressurection Sunday, I thought it a good opportunity to provide an answer.

The short answer is that I know it to be true because of my personal experience. Once I repented of my sins in August of 2001 and accepted God’s free gift of salvation and eternal life through belief in His Son Jesus, my entire life changed. While I am constantly undergoing the sanctification process, there were many “things” in my life that went away after I came to faith (including many unhealthy and self-destructive attitudes and behaviours.) The only logical conclusion for why this change took place is that I received a supernatural heart transplant once I placed my faith in the Jewish Messiah Yeshua (Jesus) who literally gave me a new spiritual heart.

Aside from my own personal experience, I have come to find out that my faith is built, not on a myth, but on a solid rock of historical evidence. Christ’s birth, life, ministry, death, and resurrection is the most documented and authenticated event in human history.

Unless somebody can prove to me that it’s all a lie and that the tomb wasn’t empty and that Christ didn’t rise from the dead (3 days following His crucifixion as prophesied in the Old Testement 1000s of years prior when crucifixion didn’t even exist) and appear to 1000s of other witnessess after his death on separate occasions (as He promised He would do), I will continue to be eternally grateful that I know that by repenting of my sin and believing on the name of Christ that I have been forgiven of all of my sins in the eyes of God and have the greatest gift of all…eternal life in Heaven with the entire Body of Believers and the One True God of the Bible, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob whose only Son is my Saviour, Redeemer and Lord, Yeshua, Jesus.

“I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father but through me.” John 14:6

All glory, honor and praise be to Him for such a simple truth! For faith in Him alone by God’s grace alone is the only way to Heaven.

Here is a great short article that lists the most compelling evidence of the Resurrection I highly recommend reading:

Evidence of the Resurrection by Josh McDowell

Professor Thomas Arnold, for 14 years a headmaster of Rugby, author of the famous, History of Rome, and appointed to the chair of modern history at Oxford, was well acquainted with the value of evidence in determining historical facts. This great scholar said: “I have been used for many years to study the histories of other times, and to examine and weigh the evidence of those who have written about them, and I know of no one fact in the history of mankind which is proved by better and fuller evidence of every sort, to the understanding of a fair inquirer, than the great sign which God hath given us that Christ died and rose again from the dead.” Brooke Foss Westcott, an English scholar, said: “raking all the evidence together, it is not too much to say that there is no historic incident better or more variously supported than the resurrection of Christ. Nothing but the antecedent assumption that it must be false could have suggested the idea of deficiency in the proof of it.”

In today’s Washington Post Ralph Reed states:

“Look, if the Supreme Court does with marriage what it did on abortion, which is to impose the laws of New York and Massachusetts and impose them on the rest of the country by judicial fiat, it will make this issue more divisive and contentious, not less so,”

Reed makes the often-made mistake by conservatives of assigning powers to the Supreme Court that it doesn’t possess.

The Supreme Court didn’t “impose” any laws on any states since the judiciary possesses no law making powers. Individual sovereign states merely treated a toothless, unconstitutional, immoral court opinion as if it were actual law. In other words, individual sovereign states ceded law making power and authority to the court which the court DID NOT POSSESS in the first place. (As Romney did when he falsely asserted the court forced him to sign in $50 co-pay abortions and pass out marriage licenses to same-sex couples in Massachusetts).

This is what I believe Christian and conservative leaders should be proactively saying now in anticipation of the Court’s likely ruling that barring same-sex “marriage” is unconstitutional:

“If the Supreme Court rules that the exclusivity of male-female marriage to be unconstitutional they will have issued an anti-Constitutional, illegal, immoral and legally null and void administrative opinion (as Roe v Wade was) that each individual sovereign state has the Constitutional and moral obligation to ignore since any law or court opinion contrary to God’s Divinely Revealed Law is no law at all and since the judiciary possesses no law making authority. As President Lincoln once famously said, ‘..if the policy of the government, upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made, in ordinary litigation between parties, in personal actions, the people will have ceased, to be their own rulers, having, to that extent, practically resigned their government, into the hands of that eminent tribunal.’ May that not be the case in our nation.”

When conservatives perpetuate toxic liberal lies by ceding their illogical, specious and faulty premises and pre-suppositions, (in this case that court opinions become the “law of the land” the moment they are issued) we always lose…

…And if civil government’s primary duty is to protect the God given right to life for all innocent human persons, then why is it that “we the people” continue to elect people to all levels and branches of government who perpetually fail to fulfill their primary moral and Constitutional obligation as God’s civil magistrates…to protect the God given right to life?

And why do so few Christian leaders, pastors and members of the media with large platforms fail to demand that they do so?

And are we as Christians any less to blame for the bloodshed (4,000 innocent tiny babies murdered today and every day in our country) when we continue to support, fund and cast our precious votes for those who refuse to fulfill their primary duty as God’s civil magistrate?

Isn’t it time that we demand that in return for our vote that any candidate running for any public office promise to fulfill his/her primary moral and Constitutional duty to protect, defend and enforce the God given right to life for all who are made in the image of God no matter their age, color, physical disability or stage of development?

Can a God bless any nation who permits the shedding of innocent blood?

I think not…

“We will have to repent in this generation…not merely for the vitriolic words and actions of the bad people, but for the appalling silence of the good people.” ~MLK

“Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and are therefore called natural rights, such as are life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislation has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner himself commit some act that amounts to forfeiture.” William Blackstone

“The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a ‘person’ within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment.”
Justice Harry A. Blackmun, Roe vs. Wade, 1973

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men…”

The Declaration of Independence

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

The Preamble, or Statement of Purpose, of the United States Constitution

“God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever.” Thomas Jefferson

“You shall not murder.”

Exodus 20:13

“Our fathers, recognizing God as the author of human life, proclaimed it a ‘self evident truth’ that every human being holds from the Creator an inalienable right to live … If this right be denied, no other can be acknowledged. If there be exceptions to this central, this universal proposition, that all men, without respect to complexion or condition, hold from the Creator the right to live, who shall determine what portion of the community shall be slain? And who shall perpetrate the murders?”Joshua R. Giddings, 1858, in reference to the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The Roe v Wade opinion, issued by a Republican majority during a Republican administration 40 years ago today, was a toothless, unconstitutional, illegal and anti-Christical decision on a fraudulent case (Jane “Roe” has since admitted she was never raped and is now a pro-life Christian).

Roe is not “the law of the land” as so many “Christian” leaders, media pundits, pro-family/pro-life and legal organizations sadly claim. And we must stop parroting this falsehood!

Courts don’t make law and every civil magistrate at every level and branch of government has a solemn moral and Constitutional OBLIGATION to ignore Roe and enforce the God given right to life for all innocent human persons from conception to natural death.

The primary purpose and obligation of civil government is to PROTECT INNOCENT HUMAN LIFE!

Any chief law enforcement officer (president or governor) who fails to enforce the inalienable right to life in accordance with the 5th and 14th amendments, and more significantly, with the “laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Thou Shalt Not Murder) is in egregious violation of their oath and should be impeached and removed from office!

Period!

But this will never occur if the Body of Christ remains silent.

Be bold Christian friend!

Demand that your elected officials enforce the God given right to life for all and stop making excuses for them.

For we must obey God rather than man…

Demand they do their job in fulfillment of their oath!

We get the government we deserve.

We get the government we tolerate.

May today be the day we stop tolerating a (GOP majority House of Representatives) government that consents to and even funds (with our tax dollars) infanticide!

May conservatives and Christians stop tolerating and supporting elected officials who don’t fulfill their primary duty to protect and defend the God given right to life for all innocent human persons!

I think 40 years and 55,000,000 murdered pre-born babies is enough?

Don’t you?

“God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever.” Thomas Jefferson

“You shall not murder.” Exodus 20:13

“Our fathers, recognizing God as the author of human life, proclaimed it a ‘self evident truth’ that every human being holds from the Creator an inalienable right to live … If this right be denied, no other can be acknowledged. If there be exceptions to this central, this universal proposition, that all men, without respect to complexion or condition, hold from the Creator the right to live, who shall determine what portion of the community shall be slain? And who shall perpetrate the murders?” Joshua R. Giddings, 1858, in reference to the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

1. you say you are “personally opposed to child murder but don’t think you have the right to tell others not to murder their children.”

2. you say you are ok with murdering children in certain circumstances.

3. you support laws that end with the 7 words, “and then you can kill the baby.”

4. you only support child murder if the baby is murdered in the first 90 days.

5. you support the legalization of chemical abortafascients like “plan B.”

6. you’re ok with Congress allocating your tax dollars to Planned Parenthood, The Global Fund, and Obamacare for tax funded child murder.

7. you vote for politicians who support the legalized murder of children at any level.

Why would we reasonably expect the very same government that refuses to enforce the God given right to life for all innocent human persons to enforce the God given right of self-defense (to “keep and bear arms”)?

Published at World Net Daily

Now that Mitt Romney lost to one of the most unpopular presidents in U.S. history, the question many are asking is: Why?

Political pundits on the left and right are claiming that Romney appealed too much to the “extreme right fringe” and was not “moderate enough.”

The truth is that the exact opposite is true.

Prior to the 08’ election I wrote an article entitled, “RINO=GOP RIP” and warned the GOP not to nominate a liberal establishment candidate like Rudy McRomney for the simple reason that it is virtually impossible to win a national presidential election without your base on election day as 1976, 1992, and 1996 all demonstrated. Unfortunately, the GOP elites thought the pro-family/pro-life Christian base would hold their proverbial noses and vote for their candidate who was essentially a liberal Democrat, John McCain regardless.

They were wrong.

Obama won in an historical landslide.

Fast forward to 2012 and many of us warned that if the GOP once again nominated an establishment approved liberal like Romney that it would virtually assure 4 more years of the Neo-Marxist radical community organizer in the White House since, again, it’s virtually impossible to win without your base on election day.

But once again, the liberal elites who essentially run the GOP (Reince Priebus, Karl Rove, The Bushies, the folks over at Fox News, the Weekly Standard and National Review) rammed yet another establishment liberal RINO down our throats who was, from the very beginning, destined for defeat.

Obama’s base turned out Tuesday night.

Romney’s didn’t.

And why should they have?

After all, in just the past few months, Romney did virtually everything possible to snub the very same Evangelical conservative GOP “Values Voters” base ( whose support he would need in every one of the key swing states he lost last night) by:

• Refusing to sign the Susan B. Anthony and Personhood U.S.A pro-life pledges.
• Reaffirming his opposition to bans on homosexual scoutmasters.
• Opposing 100% pro-life, pro-family, across the board conservative Senatorial candidate, Todd Akin.
• Running pro-abortion ads in key pro-life swing states.
• Stating that “abortion legislation” and Chick Fill-A was not “part of his agenda.” (marriage, life, and small business not “part of your agenda?”)

Santorum was right when he said that Romney was the “worst Republican in the country to run against Obama.”

Having lost his own senate re-election bid by 18 points in 2006 by snubbing his own base (by supporting uber-liberal Arlen Specter over conservative primary challenger Pat Toomey), Santorum was all too familiar with what happens when your base stays home on election day.

The GOP elites should have listened to sweater vest Santorum.

So, how do we stop perpetually repeating this mistake every 4 years you ask?

Simple.

Christian and conservative leaders and grassroots citizens must make it clear that we will, under no circumstances, compromise our core moral and spiritual beliefs by supporting godless liberals like Romney for public office no matter how many time the liberal GOP inside-the-beltway elites tell us our 100% pro-life, pro-marriage, pro- rule of law Constitutional conservative Christian candidate isn’t “electable.”

When we set the standard based on God’s authoritative Word and tell those running to represent us that if they don’t meet that standard that they will not get our support, I believe we will get candidates who truly represent us.

I’m talking about candidates who believe that our rights come from the God and who actually understand that the primary purpose of civil government is to protect and defend those God given (inalienable) rights (chiefly the right to life without which all other rights are meaningless) and that every elected official at every branch and level of government possesses the same sworn obligation to enforce the imperative requirements of the Supreme Law of the Land.

There were obviously millions of Christians and conservatives who don’t subscribe to the utilitarian-secular-humanist and anti-Biblical “lesser of two evils” construct who refused to cast a vote for the most radically pro-abortion, pro-homosexual governor in the history of the Republic regardless of who his opponent was.

If the GOP is serious about reversing course in the next election they may want to run actual candidates whom the base will actually turn out for on election day.

Because, as Romney proved election night, you don’t win without your base on election day…

Published at Westernjournalism.com

It is frequently said that Mitt Romney’s Mormon religious beliefs are irrelevant because, as the common refrain goes, “We are electing a President not a Priest.”

Yet if Willard Mitchell Romney is elected as the nation’s 45th President, we would, ironically enough, actually be electing a priest president.

And while many may not think that Romney’s religious beliefs will influence how he governs, the core tenets of Romney’s own faith say otherwise.

Romney, who is a 5th generation high temple Mormon priest and great-great- grandson of Joseph Smith’s right hand man Parley Pratt (a major leader of the Mormon Church who was murdered by the estranged husband of his 12th wife) has frequently stated that he takes his Mormon faith “very seriously.”

The same polytheistic “faith” whose core doctrines, covenants, and prophetic pronouncements state that:

The Bible on its own can’t be trusted and that we can only understand it through the “revelations” of the Mormon “prophet” Joe Smith. (Mormon Doctrine, p. 670)

Jesus is the “spirit brother of Lucifer” and not God in the flesh. (Mormon Doctrine, p. 163.)

There is no hell. (Mormon Doctrine, p. 348)

Blacks have the “mark of Cain” (“a flat nose and black skin”) “and are cursed.” (Journal of Discourses, 7:290)

Women are inferior to men. (19th-century LDS leader Erastus Snow preached: “No woman will get into the celestial kingdom, except her husband receives her, if she is worthy to have a husband; and if not, somebody will receive her as a servant.”)

God came from another planet, has a body of flesh and bones like man’s and has a goddess wife, and we can become literal gods. (Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, p. 345; Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 7, p. 333)

Only Mormons inherit the afterlife in the “celestial kingdom” and that there is no salvation outside the Mormon Church. (Mormon Doctrine, p. 670).

So, is it really fair to say that Romney’s deeply-held religious beliefs are irrelevant when Romney himself has sworn a blood oath in a secret Mormon temple ceremony to obey the Mormon Church and its prophet above the U.S. Constitution?

Go ahead and vote for the most radically pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, anti- family governor in U.S. History if you subscribe to what I believe to be the totally un-Biblical, utilitarian, and morally-relativistic “lesser of two evils” construct.

But let’s not delude ourselves that if we elect Romney to the office of the presidency, we’re not electing a priest whose primary allegiance is to the polytheistic, anti-Christical Mormon “church”, its “prophet”, and their apostate beliefs (and not to the United States Constitution.)