Professional golfer Sergio Garcia’s remark that he would serve Tiger Woods “fried chicken every night” when asked at last night’s European Ryder Cup Awards Dinner what he would serve if Tiger came to Garcia’s house for dinner was totally inappropriate, hurtful to Tiger, and I believe blatantly racist.

Garcia has apologized if “people were offended by (his) remarks” instead of more appropriately, and I believe candidly, apologizing that his remarks were blatantly racist and that he should not have said them.

But if we are honest with ourselves I believe we can all admit at least once in our lives to having utterered a racist epithet or thinking a racist thought. Perhaps the only thing that makes Garcia different from the rest of humanity is that his racist comment was so public.

Garcia feels sick about the entire episode and well should. And the reason he does is that his conscinece is telling him that his comments were hurtful to another human being which is why God tells us to choose our words carefully since the tongue “has the power of life and death.”

But the good news is that there is an immediate answer to what ails Garcia, Woods (who has made his fair share of mistakes as well), and all the rest of us who mess up and do and say things we ought naught.

And His Name is Jesus. God’s Son who came to this earth 2,000 years ago with one singular purpose. To die on a cross for all the sins of the world so that merely by believing in Him and accepting His perfect atoning blood sacrifice that we who mess up (because of our inherent sin nature) and fall short of the Glory of God could be made right (restored) in our relationship with God the Father and given new life, forgiveness of all sins and eternal life with God in Heaven!

I am guessing that neither Garcia nor Woods has accepted the free gift of salvation that only comes by God’s Grace though repenting of ones sins and believing in Christ Jesus alone. But I hope and pray they do.

While Garcia’s very public racist remark may never be forgiven by Woods or forgotten by golf fans and the media, at least by getting right with God by repenting and placing his faith in the Promised Messiah of Israel, Yeshua Jesus, Garcia can have the peace of mind that God has forgiven him and that he can have a fresh start and a literal new birth and new life. Praying he and anybody else who doesn’t know God’s amazing mercy, forgiveness and love will do likewise.

“Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.”(2 Corintheans 5:17)

This article that has been circulating around the Internet essentially says that Mormonism is NOT another branch of Orthodox Christianity BUT that it is ok for Christians to vote for a Mormon for president by repeating the toxic liberal lie that “we are electing a president not a preacher.”

Of course what a candidate believes about The God of the Bible and His Son (God in the flesh) Jesus Christ and whether that candidate serves the Only True God is the single most important thing we can know about any candidate (or any man for that matter) since that fundamental view/belief influences where he believes our rights come from (either from The God of the Bible or from man), what he believes the central purpose of govt to be (either to protect God given inalienable rights especially the right to life or to create/regulate new rights regardless of whtether they are contrary to the “laws of nature and Nature’s God”) and how he will ultimately govern (either in accordance with the Divinely Revealed Law of God or in opposition to it).

So, yes, what a candidate believes about the God of the Bible and the extent to which that candidate governed in the past in accordance with those beliefs, is, in my humble opinion, the single most significant thing we can know about him (her).

1. Romney won the popular vote in his “home state” (1 of about 5 “home states”) by about 3% over a very battered, out financed, and relatively weak opponent in Santorum.

2. After running for president for the past half decade and outspending all his opponents combined by at least 10-1, Romney got 10% less of the vote in his “home state” than he did 4 years ago.

3. Romney may either split or even lose the delegate count in his “home state.”

4. Christians who voted for Romney evidently don’t care that as governor, Romney signed into law $50 co-pay elective surgical abortions (3 year after his alleged “pro-life conversion,”) illegally implemented same-sex “marriage” (falsely claiming the court ordered him to), forced Catholic Hospitals to issue chemical abortion pills, forced Catholic Charities to place children with sodomite couples, opposes bans on homosexual scoutmasters, boosted funding for homosexual and transgender “education” starting in kindergarten, sponsored “youth gay pride events,” and signed into law the very model on which Obamacare was based…Ted Kennedy-Hillary Clinton-Planned Parenthood-approved, Romneycare (which actually was to the left of Obamacare in that Romneycare underwrites free and $50 co-pay child murder...( all of which is, no doubt, “severely conservative.”)

5. If the Rockefeller RINO-liberal-elites who currently run the GOP think that a guy who couldn’t get more than 4 out of 10 voters to vote for him in his own “home state” after running for president for half a decade can beat Obama in November, they’re smoking crack….

Over the past couple of months in discussions relating to my new book I co-authored with nationally syndicated radio host, Steve Deace, “We Won’t Get Fooled Again: Where the Christian Right Went Wrong and How to Make America Right Again,” I am often asked whether or not Christians should support the “lesser of two evils” Mitt Romney if he faces off against Barack Obama in November.

I have written recently on why I as a Christian cannot vote for Romney under any circumstances mainly because Christians are never permitted to “do evil that good may come of it.”

But for the sake of argument, I will concede the point that Christians are permitted to vote for the “lesser of two evils” and ask the question, based on their actual records, which the more evil of the two is…Barack Obama or Mitt Romney?

On many social and economic issues Obama and Romney are virtually indistinguishable.

Obama supports homosexual “education” in public schools. As governor, Romney boosted funding for homosexual and transgender “queer education” starting in kindergarten and sponsored and issued proclamations for “youth gay pride” events.

Obama and Romney Both:

Support state level ENDA (Employment Nondiscrimination Act) legislation that would force religious organizations to hire homosexuals, lesbians, bi-sexuals, and transgenders or be fined or put out of business.

Oppose legislation banning openly homosexual Boy Scout Masters.

Made promises to the homosexual Log Cabin Republicans to advance their agenda in return for their endorsement. Romney promised them he could out-gay Teddy K when running for Senate against him in 1994 and promised them that in return for their endorsement for governor in 2002 not to oppose “gay marriage.”

Have been strong supporters of “gun control.”

Criticized Joint Chiefs of Staff, Peter Pace for saying that homosexual behavior is “immoral.”

Opposed the Bush Tax Cuts.

Supported Bush-McCain-Kennedy Amnesty.

Supported McCain-Lieberman “Cap and Trade.”

Supported McCain-Feingold “Campaign Finance Reform.”

Stated that they believe “global warming” is anthropogenic.

Nominated open homosexuals to the courts.

Documented Proof Links Here

So, I guess at this point, if one were keeping score, Obama and Romney would be in a virtual dead heat in terms of their support for and advancement of evil (assuming, as I assume most Christians and conservatives would, that support for and advancement of godless and immoral “laws” could rightfully be considered evil).

But there are a few major areas where Romney actually pulls ahead of Obama in the area of promoting and advancing evil.

Gregg, come on. Now you have gone too far! What are you talking about? After all, our leading celebrity conservative talker/pundits tell us all the time that Obama is the most evil president we have ever had. And virtually none of them in the national media has ever once even mentioned the types of “evil” things you are attributing to Romney.

Well, which is more evil? Obamacare? Or its harbinger, Planned Parenthood-Teddy Kennedy-Hillary Clinton endorsed Romneycare that served as the very model for Obamacare but went even further to the left of Obamacare in that Romeycare subsidizes free and $50 co-pay elective surgical abortions?

Which is more evil? Obama’s recent attempt to force Catholic Hospitals to cover “emergency contraception” (chemical abortion pills) or Mitt Romney who was actually the first to force Catholic Hospitals to issue abortafascients even though he was not permitted to by law which even Mike Dukakis has stated publicly?

Which is more evil? Obama who claims that he supports limiting marriage to one man and one woman but supports reciprocal benefits and civil unions or Mitt Romney who, as governor, unilaterally, illegally, and unconstitutionally implemented same-sex “marriage” falsely claiming the court forced him to and forced Catholic Charities to place children with homosexual couples, again, even though he was not required to by law?

On balance, I think a very plausible argument could be made that, based on their actual records and stated positions above, Romney has actually accomplished significantly more evil than Obama.

So if we as Christians and conservatives should support the “lesser of two evils” in November, does that mean we should vote for Obama in November if Romney is his opponent?

Something to think about…

Last week, CNN’s Piers Morgan questioned GOP Presidential candidate Rick Santorum regarding his position on contraception.

Santorum stated that he believes in the Catholic Church’s teachings on contraception (they oppose it) but that as Senator he voted for national and international funding for contraception and that as president he would do the same. This faulty line of reasoning (“I won’t impose my personally held relgious and moral beliefs on others”) is almost exactly the same as John Kerry’s 2004 statement that he wouldn’t allow his personal opposition to “abortion rights” influence his public policy (which was to support unfettered child murder).

Since all laws are based on morals, the only question is what those underlying morals will be.

Santorum believes that all abortion in all cases is murder and recently signed the USA Personhood pledge which would protect the inalienable right to life for all human persons by defining the word “person” in the 14th Amendment to apply to all human persons from the very moment they are conceived (at fertilization). So evidently he does believe that he can (and should) apply his personal moral convictions and beliefs about the sanctity of human life to public policy. And as a Christian he is 100% correct in doing so since any law contrary to God’s Divnely Revealed Law is “no law at all.”

Instead of ceding the moral premise of his argument by stating, in essence, that he would enforce immoral laws to which he is opposed, Santorum should have merely said to Piers that he believes that all contraception is morally wrong (coinciding with Catholic Church teachings) and especially “contraception” that kills nascent human beings (i.e., abortafascients such as RU-486 and other “emergency contraception.”) and that funding of any contraception is unconstitutional. Plain and simple. And that as president he would merely abide by his constitutionally sworn oath and veto all legislation and ignore any judicial opinions not in accord with the United States Constitution and more importantly, the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.”

Memo to Rick: You are now officially in the proverbial “Big Leagues.”

Not time to go wobbly to borrow a phrase from Lady Thatcher.

Not time to equivocate.

If the Bible and the U.S. Constitution (in that order) are truly your plumb-line for any of your positions and actions you will take as president, it’s time to stand up and say so without pause or regret.

Stick to your guns, especially on the most important moral/social issues of our times.

Choose this day whom you will serve!

“Peter and the apostles said, ‘We must obey God rather than man.’”

1. Campaigning for governor, Mitt Romney (as reported in the NY Times) meets with the homosexual “Log Cabin Republicans” in a gay bar and promises them he will not oppose same-sex “marriage” as governor. (A few years prior when running for Senate, he promised them he would get more accomplished for them than Ted Kennedy would.)

2. The MSJC (who lacked the subject matter jurisdiction to even hear the case in the first place) issues advisory Goodridge opinion declaring that barring same-sex “marriage” is unconstitutional and urges the legislature to amend the current marriage statute (chapter 207 in Massachusetts General Laws) to accommodate same-sex unions.

3. The legislature ignores the court’s opinion and takes no action to amend the current marriage statute which limits marriage to one man and one woman.

4. The court admits in their opinion that they are in no way attempting to change the current marriage statute (chapter 207)

“Here, no one argues that striking down the marriage laws is an appropriate form of relief.”

5. The court admits that the current marriage statute makes homosexual “marriage” illegal.

“We conclude, as did the judge, that M.G.L. c. 207 may not be construed to permit same-sex couples to marry.”

…and that the only way the marriage statute can be amended is by the legislature and the legislature alone.

“The power of suspending the laws, or the execution of the laws, ought never to be exercised but by the legislature, or by authority derived from it, to be exercised in such particular cases only as the legislature shall expressly provide for.” (PART THE FIRST, Article XX.)

“All the laws which have heretofore been adopted, used and approved … shall still remain and be in full force, until altered or repealed by the legislature…” (PART THE SECOND, Article VI.)

6. Romney, in violation of at least 8 articles of the oldest functioning constitution in the world (which is a constitutional felony), the Massachusetts Constitution authored by John Adams, falsely claims the court (who possesses no law making authority) “legalized same-sex marriage” and that he had no choice but to obey the “new marriage laws.”

7. Romney then authorizes alterations to marriage licenses changing them from “husband” and “wife” to “partner A” and “Partner B” without an accompanying, enabling and legally binding statute as required by the Massachusetts Constitution.

8. Romney forces justices of the peace and town clerks to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples or be fired again without an accompanying enabling and legally binding statute as required by the Massachusetts Constitution.

9. Romney personally issues 189 special marriage licenses to same sex couples.

10. The marriage licenses that have been issued to same-sex couples in Massachusetts are as legally null and void today as they were in 2004 when Mitt Romney unilaterally began issuing them.

In short:

• In order for same sex “marriage” to become “legal “in Massachusetts, the legislature would have had to change the marriage statute to accommodate same-sex “marriage” since only the legislature can make or amend the laws.

• The legislature never changed the marriage statute.

• Homosexual “marriage” is still illegal as are the hundreds of thousands of illegally altered marriage licenses issued since 2004.

• Mitt Romney was unilaterally responsible for the illegal and unconstitutional implementation of same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts as Senator Rick Santorum and a whole host of other highly respected legal scholars have said.

The facts are cut and dry and indisputable.

And facts are, indeed, stubborn things.

My question is why so many of Romney’s most high profile supporters (Jay Sekulow, Mark DeMoss, Hugh Hewitt, The Bushes, Carl Rove, John McCain, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, etc…) who all claim to be “law and order Constitutional conservatives” continue to ignore one of the greatest acts of legal and Constitutional malfeasance in the history of the Republic?

First the ones I would not be caucusing for if I lived in Iowa.

Rick Perry- Does great in commercials but once the script is gone I get that same feeling right before he speaks that I had with Bush…a very unsettling one at that. Kind of looks like Bush too. Way too many bad memories whenever I see this “tough talkin Texan.” And like Bush, his commitment to conservatism is highly questionable. Glad he signed the USA Personhood Pledge recently. The best thing he could do in 2012 as governor is abide by his pledge and end all child murder in Texas by helping pass Personhood. Better yet, he could just enforce the 14th Amendment’s “due process” and “equal protection” clauses as he is constitutionally obligated to do and end child murder now given he is on record stating that human life begins at the very moment of fertilization!

Rick Santorum- Phenomenally inspiring personal family story and one of the strongest pro-family/ pro-life candidates and the only candidate with the courage in the debates to expose Romney’s unilateral, illegal and unconstitutional implementation of same-sex “marriage” . (which the “fair and balanced” media have just coincidentally ignored). But his endorsements of pro-aborts Arlen Specter, Christie Todd Whitman, and the Founding Father of same-sex “marriage,” the $50 co-pay abortion, and socialist healthcare, Mitt Romney (over significantly more conservative Mike Huckabee, in 08’) is really tough to swallow. 3 endorsements of liberal pro-aborts is 3 too many in my book.

Newt Gingrich- The most articulate candidate in the race and the only one with an authentic plan to rein in the judiciary. His recent signing of the USA Personhood Pledge is also a positive. And while I can get over the Pelosi commercial on Al Gore’s “global warming” initiative which Gingrich now claims was a big mistake, his negatives are too numerous to overlook including his membership in the globalist Council on Foreign Relations, his endorsement of pro-abortion, pro-homosexual tax and spend liberal RINO ACORN-backed Dee Dee Scozaffava (recipient of the Planned Parenthood “Margaret Sanger Award” in 2008) over the across the board conservative Republican tea party favorite, Doug Hoffman in the N.Y. 23rd District Congressional race, leaving his dying wife on her death bed while she was dying of cancer for another younger woman, recently working with anti-Semitic Al Sharpton to promote Obama’s new healthcare initiatives which includes increased funding for the unconstitutional Department of Education, his statement in 1995 at the Center for Strategic and International Affairs, that, “The American challenge in leading the world is compounded by our Constitution…Under our [constitutional system] — either we’re going to have to rethink our Constitution, or we’re going to have to rethink our process of decision-making,” and his recent failure to sign the Iowa Christian pro-family Family Leader’s marriage pledge which I don’t know how any genuine pro-family Christian would not sign.

Ron Paul- Right on the fed, rolling back the welfare state, and nation building. But that is where we part ways. I as a Christian can’t vote for anybody who thinks individual states possess the authority to alienate the inalienable right to life, that sodomy isn’t a sin, who has no problem with homosexual “marriage,” who supports legalizing hard drugs such as heroin, cocaine as well as prostitution, and who has no real issues with Islamic Jihadists in Iran getting a hold of nukes which it has announced it plans to wipe Israel off the map with. Proof

Mitt Romney- The most far left across the board liberal governor in the history of the Republic. Hands down. Pathetic so many celebrity conservatives like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham continue to support this total fraud.

As governor, Willard Mitchell Romney: Unilaterally, illegally & unconstitutionally instituted same-sex “marriage” falsely claiming the “court ordered him to,” signed the forerunner to Obamacare (Romneycare) into law which includes $50 tax-subsidized elective surgical abortions including late-term abortions into law (3 years AFTER his fake “pro-life conversion,” boosted funding for homosexual “education” starting in kindergarten, opposes a ban on homosexual scoutmasters, promised the homosexual Republican “Log Cabin Republicans” he wouldn’t oppose “gay marriage” in return for their endorsement, instituted a quasi socialist healthcare plan endorsed by Hillary Clinton, Teddy Kennedy, Barack Obama and Planned Parenthood that destroyed the Massachusetts’ economy, forced Catholic Charities, the nation’s #1 adoption and foster care service to place children with same sex couples even though he was under no legal obligation to do so as even former Governor Michael Dukakis has acknowledged, increased taxes and fees by close to a billion dollars which destroyed the Massachusetts’ economy and opposed the Bush Tax Cuts, voted # 8 RINO by Human Events, passed over Republican lawyers for three quarters of the 36 judicial vacancies he faced and nominated 2 open homosexuals, criticized Joint Chief’s of Staff, Peter Pace for saying that homosexual acts were “immoral,” supports passage at the state level of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act which would force churches and other religious organizations to hire homosexuals and transvestites or face criminal fines and prosecution, supported McCain-Feingold “campaign finance reform”, McCain-Kennedy “comprehensive immigration reform” (i.e. amnesty), and parts of the McCain-Lieberman “carbon cap and trade” bill. Proof Does anything more really need to be said?

And now the one candidate I would be caucusing for if I lived in Iowa….

Michelle Bachmann- Of all the candidates, she has the most authentic Christian conservative worldview philosophy and record. I disagree with her support for the USA Patriot Act and hope as president she would help to substantially reform it. I also have opposed her support of abortion regulations such as the immoral and unconstitutional Ohio “Heartbeat Bill” that codifies into law that it is ok to kill pre-born babies (that the bill itself acknowledges are living human beings) without “detectable heartbeats.” But I applaud her recent signing on to the USA Personhood Pledge and am hopeful that as president she would fulfill her promise to enforce the inalienable right to life for all innocent persons from fertilization to natural death when individual states fail to do so (which happens to be the case, sadly enough, in all 50 states).

Bachmann is one of the only candidates to acknowledge that America’s economic problems are the result of our moral/spiritual decline and has not only vowed to end the Abortion Holocaust by supporting Personhood but also to champion a federal marriage amendment. That being said, life and marriage are nowhere to be found on her website’s “issues page” so I do have some reservations as to how much of a priority actually ending abortion (as opposed to regulating it) and protecting marriage would be in a Bachmann administration.

On the economic issues, Bachmann, a former tax attorney, who is the head of the Congressional “Tea Party Caucus” who vehemently opposed TARP is rock solid, and I have no doubt she would energetically champion tax cuts, massive spending cuts, and the repeal of Obamacare to help stimulate economic growth and deficit reduction.

Moreover, I believe she would also be a “peace through strength” foreign policy hawk in the mold of Thatcher and Reagan. She has proven she can win highly contested elections in a blue state and have no doubt she possesses the “fire in the belly” to go toe to toe with Obama in a national election more so than any other candidate barring Gingrich who would definitely be a formidable debate opponent.

At this point, if I were living in Iowa, given the very weak GOP field, I would be caucusing for Michelle Bachmann on January 3rd.

Some may say, “But Gregg, Bachmann isn’t one of the ‘frontrunners.’”

I don’t care.

“Duty is ours. Results are God’s.”

Gregg Jackson is the national bestselling author of “Conservative Comebacks to Liberal Lies” and co-author of “We Won’t Get Fooled Again: Where the Christian Right Went Wrong and How to Make America Right Again.”

Aside from the Kool-Aid drinking Romneybots and Ron Paul clones who comprise about 3 in 10 voters combined (about 20% for Romney and 10% for Paul) depending on the poll, the other 7 in 10 voters have shown now strong and consistent preference for any of the other candidates.

What explains this tepid and highly fractured support?

As a guy who has spent the last two decades in sales and sales management in the ultra competitive high tech software and medical device industries…I can tell you that the customer (the voters) ain’t buyin what the candidates are tryin to sell them.

None of the GOP presidential candidates have come anywhere near closing the deal not only with Iowans in the first in the nation caucus state but with voters nationally.

Why you ask?

Simple.

The candidates are talking but they aren’t clearly articulating what the majority of voters want to hear. And the heart and soul of the GOP, especially in the primaries, are evangelical Christians and Catholics “values voters.” Some of the candidates have come close to speaking their language but not enough to gain their confidence, trust and energetic, committed support.

Here are 5 major points I have not heard one of the candidates clearly make that I believe would resonate strongly with the largely unenthusiastic conservative Christian base who are starving for moral clarity and consistency.

1. The primary duty of civil government is to protect the inalienable right to life. None of our other rights can be secure if the right to life for every person is not secure from the very beginning of life (at fertilization) until natural death. As president I will enforce the 14th amendment to the Constitution as I am bound by my solemn oath to do which guarantees that no state shall deprive any person of life without due process of law and equal protection under the laws. As president I will protect and defend the God given right to life wherever and whenever individual states are alienating the inalienable right to life. The time to end the silent genocide (55 million pre-born babies who have been murdered in the past 40 years) is now! We can’t wait any longer. And as president, I won’t!

Our fathers, recognizing God as the author of human life, proclaimed it a ‘self evident truth’ that every human being holds from the Creator an inalienable right to live … If this right be denied, no other can be acknowledged. If there be exceptions to this central, this universal proposition, that all men, without respect to complexion or condition, hold from the Creator the right to live, who shall determine what portion of the community shall be slain? And who shall perpetrate the murders?”
~ Joshua R. Giddings, 1858, in reference to the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

2. Our Founding National Charter, the Declaration, states explicitly that our rights come from God and that governments are instituted among men to protect those God given rights. As president I will veto any laws contrary to God’s Divinely Revealed Law since any law contrary to God’s Law is no law at all.

3. The Supreme Court is the weakest of the 3 branches of government by design wielding “neither the power of the sword nor the purse.” No judge possesses the authority to rule by judicial fiat that it is ok to murder babies, that homosexuality or bestiality that God says is an abomination is “legal,” to change God’s definition of marriage which He Himself created, or that the government has the right to steal from its citizens. I will respect the court’s administrative opinions when they are in accordance with the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” but will ignore any court opinion contrary to it and call for the removal of any judges who issue any of these illegal and anti-Constitutional opinions.

4. As president, I promise to repeal Obamacare not just because it is an economically inefficient socialist rationing scheme (which it is). I promise to repeal Obamacare because government doesn’t possess the authority to force any citizen to purchase any good or service. Obamacare is bad because it is morally wrong. It’s unconstitutional because it is contrary to the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.”

5. As president I will veto any and all unconstitutional spending and propose a 10% flat tax for every American as well as a 0% capital gains and 0% corporate income tax. No American should pay more to the government than they tithe at church. And everybody knows that businesses don’t pay taxes. They merely pass them on to the consumer in higher prices. The way to grow our economy is simple. We need to drastically cut spending (non-discretionary and discretionary) and drastically reduce the amount government collects from individual workers and businesses (large and small) to make America more competitive globally. (But none of this will matter if we continue to permit the murder of 4,000 pre-born babies a day!)

In response to an e-mail I received from Mitt Romney today I decided to add (in bold) some things I think he intended to say but for some reason left out….

Mitt, I added some stuff in red lettering you left out:-)
From: Mitt Romney
To: My Fellow Americans
Date: 11-3-11
Re: I need your vote!

The American values that have been at the heart of our historic rise to world leadership are being challenged every day. These include, among others, the institution of marriage which I played a major role in destroying by ushering in same sex “marriage” that I illegally implemented as governor of Massachusetts falsely claiming the “court made me do it”, respect for life which again I, Willard Mitchell Romney, DIS-respected consistently especially when I signed $50 tax payer funded abortions into law as part of my socialist “healthcare” plan that was the model for Obamacare…Romneycare, and protection of our children which I did by forcing Catholic Charities to place adoptive and foster children with homosexual couples even though I was not required to legally. And when I was “protecting” children when I funded homosexual and transgender “education” in all public schools beginning in kindergarten as well as “gay pride” parades. I have always been there standing strong for the children!

To remain a superpower in the world, we must continuously and vigorously re-affirm these key components that have long served as the bedrock of America’s greatness. The family holds a unique and quintessential purpose in our society. Families instill values that foster growth with current and forthcoming generations. Therefore, it is imperative that we cultivate the promotion of fundamental family values. This can be accomplished with increased parental involvement and enhanced supervision of our children like when I”cultivated” and “promoted” “family values” by signing tax payer funded abortions into law and implementing sodomy-based “marriage” like I did as Governor of Massachusetts!

It includes strict enforcement of our nation’s obscenity laws, as well as the promotion of parental software controls that guard our children from Internet pornography Like the porn the Marriott spews out that contributes to the stock dividends from Marriott Corp I receive that helps fund my new 4 million dollar mansion I am building in San Diego! (one of my many “home states” which all totally coincidentally happen to be early/important primary states:-)

As Governor of Massachusetts, I stood at the center of the battlefield on every major social issue that affected the values of family life. I fought to preserve traditional marriage when I wasn’t busy destroying it by unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally implementing same-sex “marriage” falsely claiming I was under a court order which even the court admitted it never issued… and to protect the sanctity of human life when I wasn’t busy signing legislation endorsed by Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Planned Parenthood that funded $50 tax payer funded abortions. I enforced a law that banned out-of-state same-sex couples from coming to Massachusetts to get married after I enforced the Goodridge homosexual marriage OPINION which I falsely claimed was the “new law” of the Commonwealth and supported a Federal Marriage Amendment to define marriage in our Constitution as a union of one man and one woman after previously opposing a similar amendment and when I knew the amendment I backed had no chance of passing in Massachusetts and after I had already fulfilled my campaign promise not to oppose homosexual “marriage” to the homosexual Log Cabin Republicans in return for their endorsement for governor which they gave me by the way:-).

It is my firm belief that marriage is largely about the development and nurturing of children and raising them to adhere to the values we cherish in our society which is why I fought so hard to implement same sex “marriage” in Massachusetts personally issuing 187 marriage licenses to same sex “couples”…again, falsely claiming I was merely “abiding by the new law passed by the court”. As Hillary once famously said, “it takes a village” and indeed it does! We should never discriminate based on sexual preference which is why I support state level ENDA laws that would force churches and religious organizations to hire homosexuals and transvestites or go to jail.

As President of the United States, I would continue to safeguard the institution of the American family. In the meantime, I only ask that we all pretend that I never did the things I did to destroy the family. Take another swig of the Kool Aid and repeat after me…Romney is for family values! Romney is for family values! Romney is for family values! I am running for president because I am basically a rich dude with a huge ego who craves power I believe in America and know that our best days are still ahead.

I believe that the principles that made America the leader of the world today—freedom, opportunity, and free enterprise to name just a few—are the very principles that will keep America the leader of the world tomorrow. These last few years have not been the best of times. But, while we’ve lost a couple of years, we can still get back on the right track.Again, thank you for contacting me. I encourage you to visit my website at www.MittRomney.com for updated information on other issues that may be of interest to you. I look forward to hearing from you in the future and earning your support. And if you are a Christian, just deny your faith and vote for me! But whatever you do, don’t read Gregg Jackson’s new book, “We Won’t Get Fooled Again:Where the Christian Right Went Wrong and How to Make America Right Again.”

www.wontgetfooled.com

Number 10: “I think she would be stronger on the war on terrorism. I absolutely believe that. … I will campaign for her (Hillary Clinton) if it’s McCain.” (Coulter on Hannity. Of course, Coulter ended up supporting McCain).

Number 9: “Romney governed as a pro-lifer.” (Except for the fact that Romney signed $50 co-pay elective surgical abortions into law 3 years after his supposed “pro-life conversion.”)

Number 8: “Romney (who is a Mormon) is a Christian. And the rest of it are bells and whistles.” (Coulter on Bill Keller’s LivePrayer T.V Show)

Number 7: “I’m secretly hoping for Romney/Rudy ticket…” (in an e-mail to me that will appear in my upcoming book co-authored with nationally syndicated radio host, Steve Deace, entitled: “We Won’t Get Fooled Again: Where the Christian Right Went Wrong and How to Make America Right Again.”)

Number 6: “I don’t know.” (in response to nationally syndicated radio host Steve Deace asking her if she were in Romney’s shoes if she would have signed $50 co-pay tax payer funded abortions into law as Romney did.)

Number 5: “It would look like N.Y. City during the Republican National Convention. In fact, that’s what I think heaven is going to look like. Happy joyful Republicans…” (in response to being asked on CNBC by Donny Deutch what the world would look like if her dreams came true…in other words her ideal world.)

Number 4: “He’s a stupid Christian…He isn’t very bright. He’s their vision of an evangelical. They’d like him better if he still weighed 600 pounds.” (Coulter in reference to Mike Huckabee on Fox)

Number 3:”I was going to say a few words about the Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards. But it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word, faggot.” (Coulter at CPAC witnessing her Christian faith.)

Number 2: “If we don’t run (RINO fake conservative) Chris Christie, Romney will be the nominee and we will lose.” (2011 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC))

Number 1: “Instead of sitting on our thumbs, wishing Ronald Reagan were around, or chasing the latest mechanical rabbit flashed by the media, conservatives ought to start rallying around Romney as the only Republican who has a shot at beating Obama.” (A few months after stating if Romney is the nominee he will lose to Obama, urging conservatives and Christians to support the Founding Father of the $50 co-pay abortion and sodomy-based “marriage” Mitt Romney, 7 weeks prior to the first primary being held.)

Board member of the homosexual group, GOProud and fake conservative, Ann Coulter…all over the map…