…And if civil government’s primary duty is to protect the God given right to life for all innocent human persons, then why is it that “we the people” continue to elect people to all levels and branches of government who perpetually fail to fulfill their primary moral and Constitutional obligation as God’s civil magistrates…to protect the God given right to life?

And why do so few Christian leaders, pastors and members of the media with large platforms fail to demand that they do so?

And are we as Christians any less to blame for the bloodshed (4,000 innocent tiny babies murdered today and every day in our country) when we continue to support, fund and cast our precious votes for those who refuse to fulfill their primary duty as God’s civil magistrate?

Isn’t it time that we demand that in return for our vote that any candidate running for any public office promise to fulfill his/her primary moral and Constitutional duty to protect, defend and enforce the God given right to life for all who are made in the image of God no matter their age, color, physical disability or stage of development?

Can a God bless any nation who permits the shedding of innocent blood?

I think not…

“We will have to repent in this generation…not merely for the vitriolic words and actions of the bad people, but for the appalling silence of the good people.” ~MLK

“Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and are therefore called natural rights, such as are life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislation has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner himself commit some act that amounts to forfeiture.” William Blackstone

“The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a ‘person’ within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment.”
Justice Harry A. Blackmun, Roe vs. Wade, 1973

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men…”

The Declaration of Independence

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

The Preamble, or Statement of Purpose, of the United States Constitution

“God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever.” Thomas Jefferson

“You shall not murder.”

Exodus 20:13

“Our fathers, recognizing God as the author of human life, proclaimed it a ‘self evident truth’ that every human being holds from the Creator an inalienable right to live … If this right be denied, no other can be acknowledged. If there be exceptions to this central, this universal proposition, that all men, without respect to complexion or condition, hold from the Creator the right to live, who shall determine what portion of the community shall be slain? And who shall perpetrate the murders?”Joshua R. Giddings, 1858, in reference to the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The establishment elites who run the GOP over at the RNC and who are seemingly addicted to losing and who many suspect are merely a subsidiary branch of the DNC are apparently intent on nominating the Founding Father of sodomy-based “marriage” and the $50 co-pay tax payer funded abortion, the most uber-leftist governor in our nation’s history, Willard Mitchell Romney, come hell or high-water!

Santorum has stated that even though Romney would be the “worst Republican” to run against Obama that he would consider being the running mate of the man who single-handedly signed the death warrants of pre-born babies at $50 a pop as part of his “signature achievement” as governor of Massachusetts…Ted Kennedy-Hillary Clinton-Barack Obama-Planned Parenthood endorsed Romneycare the very model on which Obamacare was designed.

And recently we found out that Newt Gingrich has been meeting regularly in private with Romney the man who Gingrich has repeatedly claimed doesn’t tell the truth. Seriously?

And Ron Paul…well what more is there to say about Ron Paul? Guy’s pro-legalization of hard core drugs and prostitution, has “no problem” with “gay marriage,” denies the Bible says homosexuality is a sin, thinks it’s ok to murder pre-born children if an “honest rape” has occurred, believes states can alienate inalienable rights, supports open sodomites in the military, has no problem with Iran acquiring nukes it has announced it will use to “wipe Israel off the map” and likely the “Great Satan” (the United States) as well.

Isn’t it long past time for Christians and conservatives to break ranks with the pro-Romney Republican Party, RNC, Carl Rove, The Bushies, Dole, McCain, the GOP conservatarian cheerleaders over at Fox and the National Review and all the other fake conservatives like Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh who have either endorsed or white-washed Romney’s far left wing record for the past half decade?

It is for me.

Time’s a tickin…

The proverbial hand-writing is on the wall.

The liberal elites who run the GOP have been on jihad since Reagan left office to purge the party of Lincoln and Reagan of those who don’t believe the Bible and Constitution are living breathing documents. (To paraphrase my good friend and co-author of our new book “We Won’t Get Fooled Again: Where the Christian Right Went Wrong and How to Make America Right Again,” Steve Deace)

I believe that Christians and conservatives who are no longer chugging the GOP kool-aid who realize that the Republicans and Democrats are merely two wings of the same bird both leading us in the same direction (away from God and His transcendent moral law) need to tell the GOP we ain’t buyin what you’re sellin.

Been on that train before (Ford, both Bushes, Dole, McCain and now Romney) and we want off.

Not taking part in the rigged 2 party sham anymore.

I can no longer support candidates for any elected office who won’t abide by their oath to protect and defend the United States Constitution regardless of whether they have an “R” or “D” after their name.

Imagine what could happen if 20 or 30 million Christians and conservatives decided to do the same instead of compromising their core values and beliefs and supporting the “lesser of two evils?”

With man this is impossible. With God all things are possible.

Aside from the Kool-Aid drinking Romneybots and Ron Paul clones who comprise about 3 in 10 voters combined (about 20% for Romney and 10% for Paul) depending on the poll, the other 7 in 10 voters have shown now strong and consistent preference for any of the other candidates.

What explains this tepid and highly fractured support?

As a guy who has spent the last two decades in sales and sales management in the ultra competitive high tech software and medical device industries…I can tell you that the customer (the voters) ain’t buyin what the candidates are tryin to sell them.

None of the GOP presidential candidates have come anywhere near closing the deal not only with Iowans in the first in the nation caucus state but with voters nationally.

Why you ask?

Simple.

The candidates are talking but they aren’t clearly articulating what the majority of voters want to hear. And the heart and soul of the GOP, especially in the primaries, are evangelical Christians and Catholics “values voters.” Some of the candidates have come close to speaking their language but not enough to gain their confidence, trust and energetic, committed support.

Here are 5 major points I have not heard one of the candidates clearly make that I believe would resonate strongly with the largely unenthusiastic conservative Christian base who are starving for moral clarity and consistency.

1. The primary duty of civil government is to protect the inalienable right to life. None of our other rights can be secure if the right to life for every person is not secure from the very beginning of life (at fertilization) until natural death. As president I will enforce the 14th amendment to the Constitution as I am bound by my solemn oath to do which guarantees that no state shall deprive any person of life without due process of law and equal protection under the laws. As president I will protect and defend the God given right to life wherever and whenever individual states are alienating the inalienable right to life. The time to end the silent genocide (55 million pre-born babies who have been murdered in the past 40 years) is now! We can’t wait any longer. And as president, I won’t!

Our fathers, recognizing God as the author of human life, proclaimed it a ‘self evident truth’ that every human being holds from the Creator an inalienable right to live … If this right be denied, no other can be acknowledged. If there be exceptions to this central, this universal proposition, that all men, without respect to complexion or condition, hold from the Creator the right to live, who shall determine what portion of the community shall be slain? And who shall perpetrate the murders?”
~ Joshua R. Giddings, 1858, in reference to the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

2. Our Founding National Charter, the Declaration, states explicitly that our rights come from God and that governments are instituted among men to protect those God given rights. As president I will veto any laws contrary to God’s Divinely Revealed Law since any law contrary to God’s Law is no law at all.

3. The Supreme Court is the weakest of the 3 branches of government by design wielding “neither the power of the sword nor the purse.” No judge possesses the authority to rule by judicial fiat that it is ok to murder babies, that homosexuality or bestiality that God says is an abomination is “legal,” to change God’s definition of marriage which He Himself created, or that the government has the right to steal from its citizens. I will respect the court’s administrative opinions when they are in accordance with the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” but will ignore any court opinion contrary to it and call for the removal of any judges who issue any of these illegal and anti-Constitutional opinions.

4. As president, I promise to repeal Obamacare not just because it is an economically inefficient socialist rationing scheme (which it is). I promise to repeal Obamacare because government doesn’t possess the authority to force any citizen to purchase any good or service. Obamacare is bad because it is morally wrong. It’s unconstitutional because it is contrary to the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.”

5. As president I will veto any and all unconstitutional spending and propose a 10% flat tax for every American as well as a 0% capital gains and 0% corporate income tax. No American should pay more to the government than they tithe at church. And everybody knows that businesses don’t pay taxes. They merely pass them on to the consumer in higher prices. The way to grow our economy is simple. We need to drastically cut spending (non-discretionary and discretionary) and drastically reduce the amount government collects from individual workers and businesses (large and small) to make America more competitive globally. (But none of this will matter if we continue to permit the murder of 4,000 pre-born babies a day!)

Celebrity conservative columnist Ann Coulter, who sits on the board of the homosexual group, GoProud appears to be attempting to out flip-flop the man who literally coined the phrase, Willard Mitt Romney.

In the run up to the 2008 election, Coulter urged conservatives and Christians to support Mitt Romney for president, whom, she said, if conservatives had done their “homework” was “manifestly the best candidate.”

A few months ago at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) Coulter seemed to be changing course when she told the grassroots conservative audience that RINO New Jersey Governor, Chris Christie was her man in 2012 and that Obama will win if Romney is the nominee. Ironically enough, when Christie announced that he would not be running in 2012, he endorsed the very man who Coulter asserted would lose to Obama.

Go figure.

In her syndicated column yesterday, “If Not Romney, Who? If Not Now, When?”. Coulter, changed course, yet again, by getting back on board the Romney train encouraging conservatives to once again take one last chug of the Romney Kool-Aid.

Glug, Glug, Glug…

According to Coulter, conservatives need to support the man who only a few months back Coulter, herself, claimed would lose to Obama if he were to become the nominee because:

“Among Romney’s positives is the fact that he has a demonstrated ability to trick liberals into voting for him. He was elected governor of Massachusetts — one of the most liberal states in the union — by appealing to Democrats, independents and suburban women… Also, Romney will be the first Republican presidential nominee since Ronald Reagan who can talk. Liberals are going to have to dust off their playbook from 30 years ago to figure out how to run against a Republican who isn’t a tongue-tied marble-mouth.”

So, Coulter thinks conservatives and Christians should support Romney because he got elected governor of a liberal state by deceiving (“tricking”) its citizens and because he “can talk?”

Seriously?

Is this the new “Coulter Standard” for choosing the next leader of the free world?

According to Coulter, Romney’s only “negatives” are his “Mormonism and Romneycare” both of which can easily be overcome according to Coulter.

As was Coulter’s modus operandi in the run up to the 08’ election when she falsely portrayed Mike Huckabee as a German Christian Democratic Socialist while simultaneously white-washing Romney’s far more liberal social and fiscal record, Coulter continues, half a decade later, to ignore and suppress Romney’s far left wing social and fiscal record which includes Romney’s:

• Illegal & unconstitutional institution of sodomy-based “marriage.”

• Signing $50 tax-subsidized abortions into law (3 years AFTER his fake “pro-life conversion”)

• Boosting funding for homosexual “education” starting in kindergarten.

• Opposition to a ban on homosexual scoutmasters.

• Promising the homosexual Republican “Log Cabin Republicans” he wouldn’t oppose “gay marriage” in return for their endorsement.

• Instituting a quasi-socialist healthcare plan endorsed by Hillary Clinton, Teddy Kennedy and Planned Parenthood that destroyed the Massachusetts’ economy.

• Increasing taxes and fees by close to a billion dollars which destroyed the Massachusetts’ economy.

• Passing over Republican lawyers for three quarters of the 36 judicial vacancies he faced and nominated 2 open homosexuals.

• Criticizing Joint Chief’s of Staff, Peter Pace for saying that homosexual acts were “immoral.”

• Support for passage of Employment Non-Discrimination Act which would force churches and other religious organizations to hire homosexuals and transvestites or face criminal fines and prosecution.

• Supporting McCain-Feingold “campaign finance reform”, McCain-Kennedy “comprehensive immigration reform” (i.e. amnesty), and parts of the McCain-Lieberman “carbon cap and trade” bill and opposing the Bush Tax Cuts.

As I explain in my forthcoming book, “We Won’t Get Fooled Again: Where the Christian Right Went Wrong and How To Make America Right Again”, I and others close to Ms. Coulter shared the above documented information with her on numerous occasions over the past 5 years both in person and in e-mail.

Sadly, Ms. Coulter has chosen to intentionally suppress Romney’s record from her millions of conservative and Christian readers.

In her article, Coulter rightly points out some of the glaring negatives of Newt Gingrich’s record including his affairs, support for Planned Parenthood award recipient Dede Scozzafava, his appearances with uber liberals Nancy Pelosi and Al Sharpton to promote the pagan religion of “global warming” and public education respectively, and the recent revelation of Gingrich being the recipient of hundreds of thousands of dollars of Freddie Mac political contributions.

So why the total silence with regard to Romney’s fully documented radical left wing record above?

Coulter claims that one of the things she admires most about Romney is that he was successful in “tricking” Massachusetts’ liberals into voting for him despite the fact that the “joke” was actually on conservatives like me who lived in Massachusetts when Romney accomplished what no liberal Democrat could have ever accomplished on their own in ushering in same-sex “marriage,” a socialist healthcare plan that includes $50 co-pay elective surgical abortions, and a billion dollars in tax and fee hikes.

But the truth is that Ms. Coulter has been trying to “trick” conservatives and Christians for quite some time now by portraying Romney as an authentic conservative who had to make a few minor compromises with Democrats in the legislature during his administration when Romney’s actual record demonstrates that Romney and Romney alone was responsible for the implementation of same-sex “marriage,” the $50 abortions, the billion dollars in tax and fee hikes etc…

My genuine hope and prayer is that she and many of her other peers in the media including Ingraham, Hannity and Limbaugh who all endorsed Romney, will level with their tens of millions of Christians and conservatives in their audiences by sharing Romney’s full record with them since they deserve to know the truth about all the candidates’ records.

But I won’t hold my breath.

And we can be sure that the mainstream media has accrued a file cabinet’s worth of material on Romney’s real record, and that the file will be opened during the general election campaign because they know the easiest way to dis-spirit the conservative-Christian GOP base is to consistently remind them how liberal their nominee is.

I agree with Coulter on this: that Romney will lose to Obama if he is the nominee as the past elections of 76’, 92’, 96’, and 08’ should have demonstrated since it is virtually impossible to win without your base. Like those past elections when the GOP has nominated a RINO, the conservative base will stay at home, and Romney’s record and its suppression by “conservative” pundits in the media will come back to bite us all.

The liberal MSM knows that RINOs seldom if ever win national elections. So they end up propping up guys who are essentially Democrats like Guiliani and McCain because they know the Christian conservative base won’t turn out in large enough numbers to vote for them on election day.

I wrote an article about this in 2007 entitled, “RINO=GOP R.I.P”

Fast forward to the 2012 race and we can see why the MSM is again propping up the Founding Father of the $50 Romneybort and homosexual “marriage,” uber liberal Country Club Republican, Willard “Mitt” Romney, whom the liberals know the conservative Christian base, especially in the heartland and south, won’t turn out for on election day in large enough numbers to defeat even the weakest of Democrat candidates. Even Barry Ho…

Although Romney is constantly touted as the “frontrunner” by the Left and pseudo-con pundits like homosexual GOProud board member, Ann Coulter and the New Kids over at National Review, he’s apparently not the “frontrunner” in many key southern and heartland states which may explain why he’s written off the first in the nation caucus state, Iowa, as well as South Carolina, this go-around.

The latest polls from some key southern/heartland states (Georgia, North Carolina, West VA, Nebraska) have Cain and Gingrich way out in front with Cain #1 in all polls with Romney, who has essentially been running for president for the past 5 years who has the highest name recognition in either 3rd or 4th place.

Ouch!

Now I am not saying that Obama’s numbers may be so low a year from now that even an uber liberal establishment RINO like Romney may actually win, but I think Ann Coulter was 100% correct when she said recently that if Romney is the GOP nominee, Obama wins.

Very, Very, difficult if not impossible to win without your base. A lesson that should have been learned in 1976(RINO Ford), 1992(RINO Bush), 1996(RINO Dole), 2004(RINO Bush who arguably only narrowly beat Kerry because of the Ohio marriage amendment being on the ballot in Ohio), and 2008(RINO McCain).

If Romney does hoodwink enough conservatives and Christians into voting for him in the primaries, as they say down south, “That dog (Romney)won’t hunt” and we will have 4 more years of the usurper ex-crack smoking Marxist in the White House in my humble opinion.

The inside the beltway GOP media elites (“Republican good, Democrat bad”) have obviously not learned their lesson.

Hoping that grassroots Christians have by now…

The man moderately more articulate than our 43rd president (which isn’t saying much) swung and missed a very slow hanging curve ball last night at the Fox News/Google GOP Presidential Debate. And I use the term “debate” very, very loosely.

Texas Governor Rick Perry was asked about Romney’s flip flops and gave a totally disjointed and incoherent answer. I literally could have coached my 6 year old to have provided a better more cogent answer.

Do any of these candidates have access to the Internet?

Do any of them actually want to win the GOP nomination?

Or are they all just auditioning to be Romney’s running mate?

Here is what I would have said about Romney’s “flip flops” if I were Perry (Not sure if my answer would fit into the neat little 60 second allotted sound bite…but I’d-a-tried like h-e double hockey stick to have gotten it all in.)

“Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney is not a “flip flopper.” He is a bald faced liar.

Romney didn’t “flip flop” on abortion. Romney is blatantly lying when he claims to have had a “pro-life conversion.” How do I know this you ask? Simple. 3 years AFTER Mr. Romney claimed to have had this “pro-life” epiphany of his (that the abortion procedure actually kills actual tiny human babies with arms and legs and blood running through their veins resting peacefully in their mother’s wombs) he signed elective surgical $50 co-pay abortions into law as part of his socialist healthcare plan (which was incidentally lauded by Obama) and endorsed by a slew of conservative titans such as Teddy Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, and Planned Parenthood. Romney isn’t flip flopping by claiming to be “pro-life.” He’s lying. Ain’t that right Mitt?

As for Romney’s claim that he did everything in his power to protect traditional marriage in Massachusetts: Again, this is another bald face lie! Romney speciously claimed that the Massachusetts Judicial Court ordered him to pass out marriage licenses to same sex couples and that he was merely complying with the “new law.” (Everybody knows court opinions are law!) A bald faced lie! Plain and simple! Romney intentionally, unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally altered and issued marriage licenses to homosexual couples. No “flip flopping” here folks. And it all makes perfect sense if you consider that Mr. Romney told the homosexual Log Cabin Republicans explicitly that he wouldn’t fight same sex “marriage” in return for their support for his gubernatorial bid. He actually said he would be more pro-gay rights than the man against whom he was running for Senate, Ted Kennedy.

And it’s not just his positions and record on life and marriage Mr. Romney is lying about. Despite being portrayed as “Mr. Business,” Romney’s rhetoric about lower taxes, smaller government, and job creation just don’t match his actual record. Do “fiscal conservatives” raise taxes and fees by a billion dollars and implement socialist healthcare plans that force citizens to buy insurance as Mr. Romney did in Massachusetts as governor which decimated the Massachusetts economy? Would a real limited government fiscal conservative have opposed the Bush Tax Cuts as Mr. Romney did (which earned him praise from stalwart Goldwater Girl, Barney Frank.)?

Mr. Romney is nothing more than Barack Obama in a Reagan Costume…And he’s not as much of a “flip flopper” as he is a liar. Next question…

A conservative Christian friend sent an article entitled “Supreme Court Tyranny.” There are many like it on the Internet on how the judiciary has usurped the legislative and enforcement powers of the other two branches. Just do a simple Google search for yourself to see.

Tyranny implies a coercive unjust act.

And the courts have, indeed, acted coercively and unjustly by issuing illegal and anti-Constitutional opinions.

But the real question is why the other two branches have allowed them to do so.

We don’t have 3 “co-equal” branches of government. That’s a bald faced lie perpetuated for years by legal positivist-humanists on the left (and far too many “legal experts” on the right).

The Founders designed the judicial branch to be “by far the weakest of the three branches” intentionally! (See Federalist 78)

The only enumerated constitutional authority the judiciary possesses is the power to issue opinions on individual cases before it. These opinions are purely advisory and only binding on the parties before them.

The judiciary possesses “neither the power of the sword nor the power of the purse.”

No law making powers and no enforcement powers!

The main reason that the courts have been able to rule “tyrannically” is that the other two more powerful branches have unconstitutionally and illegally abnegated their own authority and enumerated powers.

Even the Goodridge court in Massachusetts acknowledged that they could take no action to legalize same sex “marriage” in Massachusetts and that the legislature and the legislature alone would have to do so in order for same sex “marriage” to be “legal.” (which to this day, the legislature still has not done!)

It was Romney and Romney alone who falsely claimed that the court “legalized” same sex “marriage” and that he had to comply with the “new law” and start altering and issuing marriage licenses to same sex couples which of course he did in violation of at least 8 articles of the oldest functioning constitution in the world, the Massachusetts Constitution authored by John Adams for which Romney deserves to be behind bars!

Ditto in California when “conservative” “Republican” Arnold Schwarzenegger did the same thing…claiming that an illegal court opinion was somehow…presto…the “new law” in California he had to “follow.”

Folks, the only reason illegal and unconstitutional court opinions are treated and enforced as actual law, is that the other two more powerful branches are complicit in treating them as such.

Nationally syndicated radio host, Steve Deace and I have written a book called “We Won’t Get Fooled Again: Where the fight for righteousness in America went wrong and how to make it right again” (coming this fall based on in depth interviews conducted over the past 3 years with Christian Right and conservative leaders on where the Religious Right and conservative mvt went wrong over the past 3 decades) which deals with this particular issue more in depth, but we who call ourselves “law and order constitutionalists” must stop perpetuating the “judicial tyranny” shibboleth and instead focus on the tyranny of the other two more powerful branches and demand that they fulfill their constitutional obligation to ignore any illegally issued and unconstitutional court opinions and impeach any judges responsible for their issuance.

In other words, we must demand that the 2 strongest branches of government immediately cease from acting subserviently to the least powerful branch (the judiciary).

If we don’t, then I believe we must come to grips with the fact that “we the people” ourselves are active/passive participants and enablers of the tyranny that exists at every level and every branch of government…

Are we not?

To Romney and the many high profile “conservative” pundits and “Christian” leaders who either endorsed or support Mitt Romney for president in 2012 (Jay Sekulow, Mark DeMoss, Richard Land, Hugh Hewitt, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Tony Perkins, Tom Minnery, Jim Bopp, Stu Epperson) and who claim Romney is a “pro-family” “pro-life” and “limited government” “conservative,” I ask you the following questions:

1. How can Romney be “pro-life” when 3 years after his supposed “pro-life conversion” he signed $50 abortions into law as part of his socialist healthcare plan that was endorsed by Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, and Planned Parenthood?

2. How can Romney be “pro-marriage” when he is unilaterally responsible for the illegal and unconstitutional implementation of same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts?

3. How can Romney be “pro-family” when he boosted funding for homosexual and transgender “education” starting in kindergarten?

4. How can Romney be “pro-family” when he opposes a ban on homosexual scoutmasters?

5. How can Romney oppose the gay agenda when he promised the homosexual Log Cabin Republicans he would not oppose “gay marriage” in return for their endorsement?

6. How can Romney claim to oppose ObamaCare when Romney himself signed the forerunner for ObamaCare (Romneycare which includes $50 tax subsidized abortions) into law which has been a total failure?

7. How can Romney claim to be “pro-tax cuts” and “pro-limited government” when as governor he opposed the Bush Tax Cuts (for which he was lauded by Barney Frank) and raised taxes and fees by a billion dollars which has decimated the Massachusetts economy?

8. How will Romney be expected to appoint conservative judges if elected president when as governor he passed over Republican lawyers for three quarters of the 36 judicial vacancies he faced and nominated 2 open homosexuals?

9. How can Romney claim to stand for religious liberty and freedom of conscience when he supports passage of state level Employment Non-Discrimination Act which would force churches and other religious organizations to hire homosexuals and transvestites or face criminal fines and prosecution?

10. How can Romney claim to be a man of virtue and integrity when he consistently tells so many outright and easily disprovable lies? (“I saw my father march with MLK” “I”ve been a hunter pretty much my whole life” “The NRA endorsed me” etc…

I must say that I agree with Ron Paul on a number of economic issues including his consistent opposition to the unconstitutional Federal Reserve, both bail-outs, and the recent lifting of the debt ceiling.

But on the major social/moral issues that under-gird any society’s economy (life and marriage), Ron Paul is as far from being an authentic pro-Personhood pro-lifer and pro-family conservative as you can get.

The bottom line with Ron Paul is that he claims to be pro-life but believes that individual states may allow the killing of pre-born babies if the majority of voters say it’s ok even though inalienable rights may never be alienated. He also claims to be pro-traditional marriage but is on record numerous times in support of same-sex “marriage” (or as Paul himself says, “whatever they want to call it”).

The guy who just won the Gay friendly, formerly conservative, “Conservative Political Action Conference Presidential Straw Poll” for the second straight year:

1. Denies that God says homosexuality is a sin.

2. Supports open homosexuals in the military and repeal of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.”

3. Supports the “freedom philosophy” of legalizing cocaine, heroin, marijuana and all other hard drugs. “Government has no role or authority in regulating drugs.”

4. Supports legalization of pornography and prostitution.

5. Supports right of homosexuals to marry one another. i.e. “gay marriage.” (“Gay couples can do whatever they want.”)

6. Is “pro-choice for states” on abortion. Individual states should be able to legalize abortion if they so choose. All pre-born babies don’t possess a God given right to their own lives which no individual state may ever violate.

7. Supports “exceptions” for abortion such as “honest rapes.”

8. Supported abortion legislation regulations which have resulted in 7.4 million chemical and surgical abortions since taking office in 1997 in Congress.

9. Doesn’t believe it’s government’s role to “legislate morality” even though all laws are based on morality.

Today homoexual activist liberal Bush appointee San Francisco Judge Walker announced that “gay marriages” may begin in California next week.

What is this guy the Emperor of California?

This is Groundhog Day all over again.

As I have written numerous times on this site, judges can’t make law!

Prop 8 which amended the California Constitution limiting marriage to one man-one woman can’t, according to the Supreme Law of California, the California Constitution, be “overturned,” “struck down” or “repealed” but by another constitutional amendment passed by the sovereign people of the state of California.

Furthermore, marriage licences can’t be altered in any way or issued to same sex couples without a binding, enabling, accompanying statute.

And the law has not changed and can’t no matter what sodomite judges in San Francisco say.

Once again, Governor Schwarzenegger is staying true to his father’s Nazi colors by promising to authorize the changes to and issuance of marriage licenses to same sex couples in direct violation of his oath to uphold the California Constitution and only enforce and administer the laws and statutes on the books in California (as opposed to a judge’s illegal and unconstitutional pronouncement).

And sadly enough, once again, our leading “Christian” and “conservative” leaders and organizations such as Focus on the Family, ACLJ, Pacific Justice, AFA, Liberty, ADF, FRC etc…, will cede the toxic liberal lie that courts can make law. None of these “watchdog” organizations and organizational leaders held Mitt Romney responsible when he unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally instituted same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts. In fact many of them supported or endorsed him for president of the United States. And none of these groups held Governor Schwarzenegger responsible for pulling a Romney when he initially authorized the 20,000 plus marriage licenses to be illegally altered and issued to homosexual couples from California two years ago.

And sadly enough, all of these groups have complained about “judicial tyranny” and have sent out donation letters and e-mails begging for money to “fight this battle in court” instead of drawing attention to the obvious fact that the executive branch may never enforce a judges opinion in an individual matter before him and that, by doing just that, Schwarzenegger is violating his oath and the inalienable right of the sovereign people of California to govern themselves.

As the founder of the “conservative and Christian right” in America, Paul Weyrich wrote (which was ghost written by Oxford educated, John Haskins) shortly before he died a few years ago:

Lincoln acknowledged that court opinions are binding on the specific parties named and “entitled to very high respect and consideration (by) other departments of the government.” But like the Founding Fathers, he utterly rejected the claim that judges’ opinions are the law of the land:

“..if the policy of the government, upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made, in ordinary litigation between parties, in personal actions, the people will have ceased, to be their own rulers, having, to that extent, practically resigned their government, into the hands of that eminent tribunal.”

The sad reality is that we get “judicial tyranny” because we (Christians and conservatives) have allowed the judiciary to excercise constitutional legislative powers they don’t possess.

Our leading “conservative” and “Christian” organizations and leaders continue to score goals for the other team.