Archive for the ‘homosexuality’ Category

Marriage Licenses Again Being Illegally Altered and Issued in California…”Christian” and “conservative” Leaders Again Silent and Cede Lie that Judges Make Law

Friday, August 13th, 2010

Today homoexual activist liberal Bush appointee San Francisco Judge Walker announced that “gay marriages” may begin in California next week.

What is this guy the Emperor of California?

This is Groundhog Day all over again.

As I have written numerous times on this site, judges can’t make law!

Prop 8 which amended the California Constitution limiting marriage to one man-one woman can’t, according to the Supreme Law of California, the California Constitution, be “overturned,” “struck down” or “repealed” but by another constitutional amendment passed by the sovereign people of the state of California.

Furthermore, marriage licences can’t be altered in any way or issued to same sex couples without a binding, enabling, accompanying statute.

And the law has not changed and can’t no matter what sodomite judges in San Francisco say.

Once again, Governor Schwarzenegger is staying true to his father’s Nazi colors by promising to authorize the changes to and issuance of marriage licenses to same sex couples in direct violation of his oath to uphold the California Constitution and only enforce and administer the laws and statutes on the books in California (as opposed to a judge’s illegal and unconstitutional pronouncement).

And sadly enough, once again, our leading “Christian” and “conservative” leaders and organizations such as Focus on the Family, ACLJ, Pacific Justice, AFA, Liberty, ADF, FRC etc…, will cede the toxic liberal lie that courts can make law. None of these “watchdog” organizations and organizational leaders held Mitt Romney responsible when he unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally instituted same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts. In fact many of them supported or endorsed him for president of the United States. And none of these groups held Governor Schwarzenegger responsible for pulling a Romney when he initially authorized the 20,000 plus marriage licenses to be illegally altered and issued to homosexual couples from California two years ago.

And sadly enough, all of these groups have complained about “judicial tyranny” and have sent out donation letters and e-mails begging for money to “fight this battle in court” instead of drawing attention to the obvious fact that the executive branch may never enforce a judges opinion in an individual matter before him and that, by doing just that, Schwarzenegger is violating his oath and the inalienable right of the sovereign people of California to govern themselves.

As the founder of the “conservative and Christian right” in America, Paul Weyrich wrote (which was ghost written by Oxford educated, John Haskins) shortly before he died a few years ago:

Lincoln acknowledged that court opinions are binding on the specific parties named and “entitled to very high respect and consideration (by) other departments of the government.” But like the Founding Fathers, he utterly rejected the claim that judges’ opinions are the law of the land:

“..if the policy of the government, upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made, in ordinary litigation between parties, in personal actions, the people will have ceased, to be their own rulers, having, to that extent, practically resigned their government, into the hands of that eminent tribunal.”

The sad reality is that we get “judicial tyranny” because we (Christians and conservatives) have allowed the judiciary to excercise constitutional legislative powers they don’t possess.

Our leading “conservative” and “Christian” organizations and leaders continue to score goals for the other team.

Homosexual activist judge’s opinion that CA Constitutional Amendment defining marriage as one man one woman as “unconstitutional” is utterly absurd and should be ignored!

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Today, homosexual activist San Francisco U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker (George H.W. Bush appointee) issued an opinion that Prop 8, amended into law by California Voters in 2008, which defines marriage as limited to one man-one woman, is “unconstitutional.”

Here we go again.

Most headlines cite how Judge Walker “struck down” the so-called “gay marriage ban.”

For starters, judges can’t “strike down” any law whether it be a statute or constitutional amendment such as Prop 8. And it is a shame that so many “conservative” lawyers continue to parrot this toxic liberal lie. Judges may hear individual cases and rule on them as long as they have jurisdiction. But judges don’t possess any legislative authority. Period!

The judge did have subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case and issue a ruling. But a judge’s opinion isn’t law.

The only way the actual constitutional amendment, Prop 8,may be altered or overturned in any way is via another constitutional amendment, according to the California Constitution itself. Only the voters may revoke or overturn a constitutional amendment or initiative statute.

Thus, one man-one woman marriage is still the law of the land unless and until the voters amend the constitution to revoke it.

Schwarzennegger already pulled a “Mitt Romney” once by unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally authorizing changes to and issuance of marriage licenses without a binding, enabling, accompanying statute in direct violation of his constitutionally sworn oath to enforce the law (as opposed to unconstitutional court opinions).

For that every pro-family Christian legal organization in America should have called for The Gilie-Man’s impeachment. (Which none of them did since almost all of them from Liberty Council to the ACLJ to ADF believe the lie that judges actually can make law).

If Schwarzenegger again falsely claims that a judge’s utterly absurd opinion that a constitutional amendment is “unconstitutional,” which it OBVIOUSLY isn’t since the generally accepted definition of marriage has always been understood to be exclusive to one man-one woman, he should, without a doubt, be impeached for failing to enforce the law…which has still not changed and still limits marriage to one man-one woman in the state of California!

I am not surprised that this homosexual activist liberal Judge Walker issued this totally absurd unconstitutional opinion.

After all, that’s what activist liberal homosexual activist judges do.

And I predicted that this is exaclty what would happen in a post I wrote on Feb 14th of this year.

But sadder and more frustrating to me is that fact that our so-called “Christian” “conservative” “constitutionalist” lawyers, pro-family leaders, pundits and politicians will almost without exception cede and perpetuate the toxic liberal lie that the judge “struck down” the marriage amendment and that the only recourse is to fight it out in court instead of calling on Scwarzegger to uphold his oath and ignore the activist and totally unconstitutional ruling as is Scwarzenegger’s solemn duty as the chief law enforcement officer of the state of California.

The reason that liberal judges are able to “legislate from the bench” and “strike down laws” with impugnity is because “conservatives” have speciously conceded the lie that they possess the right to do so.

Is there not one single Christian conservative leader who will denounce this joke of a ruling as the legally null and void farce that it obviously is and demand that Governor Swarzenegger uphold his sworn oath and ignore it?

Obviously pro-homosexual, pro-abortion, “conservative” “Republican” Aaanald, will never uphold the Constitution (since we know liberals instinctively loathe the Supreme Law of the Land).

But wouldn’t it be nice if even one “rule of law conservative” at least attempted to demand that the rule of law actually be upheld instead of ceding imaginary powers the judiciary doesn’t possess?

What I would say and do if I were president…

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

Here is a sampling of what I would have to say about some of the major topics of the day…

Abortion: Killing babies is always wrong because God says “thou shalt not murder” and any law contrary to God’s Supreme Law which under-girds the Constitution is no law at all. Shame on so many “pro-life” “Christians” for continually ceding the lie that there is a constitutional right to kill babies and that abortion is the “supreme law of the land” and that in order to end abortion it’s ok to support legislation that regulates and subsidizes it in select circumstances. No “Christian nation” can ever expect God’s blessings when they allow 3,000 innocent defenseless babies to be murdered daily (over 50,000,000 since 1973). The abortion issue is the elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about. But until we recognize the inherent Personhood in every human baby in the womb made in the image of God by God and stop allowing babies to be killed, God’s wrath and Divine Judgment will only increase. If I were president my first official act would be to close down every abortuary in America in compliance with my sworn oath to protect and defend the Supreme Law of the Land which guarantees the inalienable right to life for every American citizen.

“Same-sex marriage”: “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.” Period. Marriage between one man and one woman is God’s standard. Any other variation is contrary to God’s Natural Law and is therefore by definition neither moral nor legal. Whether “pro-family” “conservatives” such as Mitt Romney choose to unilaterally and unconstitutionally issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples still doesn’t change the fact that there is only one definition for marriage: one man and one woman. If I were president I would support a federal marriage amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman and issue an executive order halting the illegal issuance of marriage licenses in Massachusetts and Iowa where no laws have ever been passed to legalize sodomy based “marriages.”

Public Schools: The founder of the N.Y. Humanist Society, C.F. Potter said of tax-payer funded public schools in 1930:

Education is a most powerful ally of Humanism & every American school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, & teaching only a fraction of the children do to stem the tide of a five-day program of Humanistic religion teaching? So very Humanistic is modern education that no religion has a future unless it be Humanism. The religion of tomorrow in America & all the world may not be in all respects identical with the religious Humanism we are advocating in this book, but it will be mightily like it & of the same spirit.”

Indeed, Potter and his colleague John Dewey who founded public education in America have realized their vision. Tax payer dollars have subsidized the religion of Humanism for the last 80 years in violation of the “separation of church and state” liberals are so fond of referencing. Public schools are Humanist indoctrination factories designed to take every ounce of religious (Christian) faith out of children. If elected president I would urge every Christian parent to take their children out of the godless atheistic Marxist Madrassas and would issue an executive order shutting down the Department of Education. Shame on Bush and other “conservative” “Republicans” for increasing funding for public education.

Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro): Obama (until he releases his long form birth certificate showing the hospital in Hawaii he was born in and the doctor who delivered him with the date and time) is in my mind a foreign born rabid Marxist who is illegally occupying the People’s House. No law that he has ever signed is valid since he has not demonstrated that he is constitutionally eligible to be POTUS. Sad that very few “law and order” “conservatives” have demanded Obama prove his natural born citizenship as a full Congressional committee demanded of McCain. As president I would issue executive orders rescinding any legislation he signed into law and have him deported back to his country of origin.

ObamaCare: The entire law is totally unconstitutional and no conservative or Christian or “pro-life” “conservative” should have supported any part of it much less amendments which subsidized select abortions (Nelson and Stupak). Christians and conservatives should have rejected the entire totalitarian Communist monstrosity en toto from the very beginning. No wonder the godless Lefties are winning the Culture War and pushing American into World Government. As president I would immediately issue an executive order rescinding Obamacare in accordance with my constitutional oath to not enforce any laws which are not in accordance with the Supreme Law of the Land.

The Supreme Court: The Founders believed that the Judiciary was by design the “weakest of the 3 branches” since judges were not elected and directly accountable to the sovereign people. Court’s opinions are not law. Only the people possess the constitutional authority to make laws directly via constitutional amendments or citizen initiatives or indirectly via their elected representatives. Any court opinion that is contrary to the Constitution is anti-constitutional and illegal and no judge possesses the right to issue illegal court opinions. The judges who issued Roe, Lawrence, Kelo, Goodridge, California re:marriage, and the Iowa “gay marriage” opinion (to name but a few of the most flagrantly unconstitutional opinions belched forth in the past 40 years), should have all been impeached. Shame on “constitutional conservatives” who perpetuate the lie that courts can make and “strike down” laws. As president I will ignore and reject any opinion issued by the Supreme Court that is contrary to the plain words of the United States Constitution and call for the impeachment of any judges who issue opinions contrary to the Supreme Law of the Land.

Illegal Immigration: Anybody who enters our country illegally should be immediately detained and deported back to their country of origin. Period. Either our federal immigration laws mean something or they don’t. Shame on our so-called “conservative” leaders (Bush, McCain, Romney etc…) who supported McCain-Kennedy “comprehensive immigration reform” which would have given 30 million illegals amnesty. If I were president, every illegal alien in our prisons (almost a third of all federal inmates are illegal aliens) would be deported back to their country of origin and I would have the Hunter border fence constructed within my first 3 months in office.

Islam: Islam is a religion (political system) of pure evil based on the teachings of its rapist, child molesting, murderous founder Muhammad whose primary goal is to establish Sharia Law and a Global Caliphate over the entire world. As president I would deport any Muslim preaching Jihad against America. Let them spew their anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, anti-American garbage elsewhere but not in America.

America: America was founded on Christian principles and it is specifically adherence to those principles which has made our country the greatest nation in the history of the world for over 300 years. The Humanists and atheists who claim otherwise ignore the overwhelming factual evidence to the contrary. If America is to be restored to her former greatness in the 21st Century and saved from the Democrat-Socialists and Globalists who seek to push America into world government, there is only one way to accomplish this task: American Christians must rededicate ourselves and our nation to God. The Founders beleived, “No King but King Jesus.” American Christians by and large have forsaken our First Love. Only Christian reformation and revival can save America at this point. As president I would work to do everything in my power to rededicate our nation back to God.

If Prop 8 is “overturned” it will only be because inept “Christian” “pro-family” and “consevative” lawyers, leaders and pundits allowed it to happen.

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

It’s obvious to me that the homosexual activist “judge” Walker in San Francisco will rule for the homosexual plaintiffs who claim Prop 8, legally defining marriage as limited to one man and one woman in the California Constitution, to be “discriminatory” and “unconstitutional.”

If Judge Walker issues a ruling that Prop 8 is “unconstitutional,” he should be impeached immediately by Governor Schwarzenegger. No judge possesses the authority to “overturn” a constitutional amendment passed via the proscribed legislative process by the sovereign voters of the state.

But is there any doubt that “conservative” “Republican” Governor Arnold will pull a Mitt Romney and assert that he “has no choice but to uphold the court’s ruling?”

Of course he will.

And when he does he will have once again abnegated his sworn duty to uphold the federal and state constitution he swore an oath in front of God Almighty to protect and defend.

The only way a citizen initiative or constitutional amendment can be changed, in any way, according to the California Constitution, is by another citizen initiative or amendment. So for Prop 8 in the California Constitution, which has enshrined into statutory law the legal definition of marriage as “one man and one woman,” to be “overturned,” another constitutional amendment would have to be passed by a majority of voters in California. That is the only way the law can change. End of story. Case closed!

Therefore, if Schwarzenegger allows an unelected judge’s toothless, unconstitutional and illegal opinion to become, in essence, the supreme law of the land (abolishing in effect, Proposition 8), conservative, pro-family, and Christian politicians, lawyers, activists and leaders should call for Schwarzenegger to be removed from office for violating his sworn oath to only enforce the laws and statutes of the state of California (as opposed to unconstitutional court opinions belched forth from radical homosexual activist judges on the 9th Circuit.)

If the people’s right to govern themselves and define marriage is “overturned” by a branch of government (the judicial branch) which doesn’t possess the authority to make or “overturn” any laws or constitutional amendments, it will only be because “our side’s” “conservative” “pro-family” and “Christian” politicians, lawyers, leaders and pundits, once again ceded the toxic liberal lie that courts possess the authority to make law.

Mitt Romney and Scott Brown Supporter and “Conservative”Boston Radio Host Chuck Morse Admits That He Doesn’t Dispute Romney Illegally Instituted Same-Sex “Marriage”

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Last week I was interviewed on the Chuck Morse Radio Show in Boston and we discussed the recent Scott Brown election to the Senate and why I believe it was a defeat, not a victory, for conservatism.

Chuck, who ran twice for Barney Frank’s Congressional Seat, also admits that despite supporting Romney, that he “doesn’t dispute” that Romney illegally institued same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts or the fact that he signed $50-tax subsidized abortions into law.

Here is the interview

American Psychiatric Association: No Consensus Among Scientists That Homosexuality Genetic

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

Hat Tip Laigles Forum

For years practicing homosexuals, bi-sexuals, lezbians, and transgenders claimed that they were “born that way.”

Even the American Phychiatric Association was bullied by militant homosexual activists into issuing the following statement:

There is considerable recent evidence to suggest that biology, including genetic or inborn hormonal factors, play a significant role in a person’s sexuality.

Recently, however, the APA reversed themselves by issuing this statement:

There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors.

The courageous and very witty Laurie Higgins, Director of IFI’s DSA -Illinois Family Institute has a very nice analysis of the most recent finding that children of practicing homosexuals are about 7 times more likely to identify as non-heterosexual as children who have a mom and a dad are.