Published at World Net Daily

Now that Mitt Romney lost to one of the most unpopular presidents in U.S. history, the question many are asking is: Why?

Political pundits on the left and right are claiming that Romney appealed too much to the “extreme right fringe” and was not “moderate enough.”

The truth is that the exact opposite is true.

Prior to the 08’ election I wrote an article entitled, “RINO=GOP RIP” and warned the GOP not to nominate a liberal establishment candidate like Rudy McRomney for the simple reason that it is virtually impossible to win a national presidential election without your base on election day as 1976, 1992, and 1996 all demonstrated. Unfortunately, the GOP elites thought the pro-family/pro-life Christian base would hold their proverbial noses and vote for their candidate who was essentially a liberal Democrat, John McCain regardless.

They were wrong.

Obama won in an historical landslide.

Fast forward to 2012 and many of us warned that if the GOP once again nominated an establishment approved liberal like Romney that it would virtually assure 4 more years of the Neo-Marxist radical community organizer in the White House since, again, it’s virtually impossible to win without your base on election day.

But once again, the liberal elites who essentially run the GOP (Reince Priebus, Karl Rove, The Bushies, the folks over at Fox News, the Weekly Standard and National Review) rammed yet another establishment liberal RINO down our throats who was, from the very beginning, destined for defeat.

Obama’s base turned out Tuesday night.

Romney’s didn’t.

And why should they have?

After all, in just the past few months, Romney did virtually everything possible to snub the very same Evangelical conservative GOP “Values Voters” base ( whose support he would need in every one of the key swing states he lost last night) by:

• Refusing to sign the Susan B. Anthony and Personhood U.S.A pro-life pledges.
• Reaffirming his opposition to bans on homosexual scoutmasters.
• Opposing 100% pro-life, pro-family, across the board conservative Senatorial candidate, Todd Akin.
• Running pro-abortion ads in key pro-life swing states.
• Stating that “abortion legislation” and Chick Fill-A was not “part of his agenda.” (marriage, life, and small business not “part of your agenda?”)

Santorum was right when he said that Romney was the “worst Republican in the country to run against Obama.”

Having lost his own senate re-election bid by 18 points in 2006 by snubbing his own base (by supporting uber-liberal Arlen Specter over conservative primary challenger Pat Toomey), Santorum was all too familiar with what happens when your base stays home on election day.

The GOP elites should have listened to sweater vest Santorum.

So, how do we stop perpetually repeating this mistake every 4 years you ask?

Simple.

Christian and conservative leaders and grassroots citizens must make it clear that we will, under no circumstances, compromise our core moral and spiritual beliefs by supporting godless liberals like Romney for public office no matter how many time the liberal GOP inside-the-beltway elites tell us our 100% pro-life, pro-marriage, pro- rule of law Constitutional conservative Christian candidate isn’t “electable.”

When we set the standard based on God’s authoritative Word and tell those running to represent us that if they don’t meet that standard that they will not get our support, I believe we will get candidates who truly represent us.

I’m talking about candidates who believe that our rights come from the God and who actually understand that the primary purpose of civil government is to protect and defend those God given (inalienable) rights (chiefly the right to life without which all other rights are meaningless) and that every elected official at every branch and level of government possesses the same sworn obligation to enforce the imperative requirements of the Supreme Law of the Land.

There were obviously millions of Christians and conservatives who don’t subscribe to the utilitarian-secular-humanist and anti-Biblical “lesser of two evils” construct who refused to cast a vote for the most radically pro-abortion, pro-homosexual governor in the history of the Republic regardless of who his opponent was.

If the GOP is serious about reversing course in the next election they may want to run actual candidates whom the base will actually turn out for on election day.

Because, as Romney proved election night, you don’t win without your base on election day…

Published at Westernjournalism.com

It is frequently said that Mitt Romney’s Mormon religious beliefs are irrelevant because, as the common refrain goes, “We are electing a President not a Priest.”

Yet if Willard Mitchell Romney is elected as the nation’s 45th President, we would, ironically enough, actually be electing a priest president.

And while many may not think that Romney’s religious beliefs will influence how he governs, the core tenets of Romney’s own faith say otherwise.

Romney, who is a 5th generation high temple Mormon priest and great-great- grandson of Joseph Smith’s right hand man Parley Pratt (a major leader of the Mormon Church who was murdered by the estranged husband of his 12th wife) has frequently stated that he takes his Mormon faith “very seriously.”

The same polytheistic “faith” whose core doctrines, covenants, and prophetic pronouncements state that:

The Bible on its own can’t be trusted and that we can only understand it through the “revelations” of the Mormon “prophet” Joe Smith. (Mormon Doctrine, p. 670)

Jesus is the “spirit brother of Lucifer” and not God in the flesh. (Mormon Doctrine, p. 163.)

There is no hell. (Mormon Doctrine, p. 348)

Blacks have the “mark of Cain” (“a flat nose and black skin”) “and are cursed.” (Journal of Discourses, 7:290)

Women are inferior to men. (19th-century LDS leader Erastus Snow preached: “No woman will get into the celestial kingdom, except her husband receives her, if she is worthy to have a husband; and if not, somebody will receive her as a servant.”)

God came from another planet, has a body of flesh and bones like man’s and has a goddess wife, and we can become literal gods. (Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, p. 345; Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 7, p. 333)

Only Mormons inherit the afterlife in the “celestial kingdom” and that there is no salvation outside the Mormon Church. (Mormon Doctrine, p. 670).

So, is it really fair to say that Romney’s deeply-held religious beliefs are irrelevant when Romney himself has sworn a blood oath in a secret Mormon temple ceremony to obey the Mormon Church and its prophet above the U.S. Constitution?

Go ahead and vote for the most radically pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, anti- family governor in U.S. History if you subscribe to what I believe to be the totally un-Biblical, utilitarian, and morally-relativistic “lesser of two evils” construct.

But let’s not delude ourselves that if we elect Romney to the office of the presidency, we’re not electing a priest whose primary allegiance is to the polytheistic, anti-Christical Mormon “church”, its “prophet”, and their apostate beliefs (and not to the United States Constitution.)

My first piece published at Floyd Brown’s Westernjournalism.com

President Obama and Governor Romney:

1. How do you both reconcile the vast majority of American’s opposition to government mandated healthcare and taxpayer funded abortions with the fact that you both signed government run healthcare into law with individual mandates and abortion coverage?

2.How do you reconcile the fact that the vast majority of Americans oppose homosexual scoutmasters with both your opposition to legal bans on homosexual scoutmasters?

3.How do you reconcile the fact that the vast majority of Americans oppose homosexual “marriage” with the fact that you, President Obama, recently came out in favor of it and you Mr. Romney unilaterally, illegally, and unconstitutionally implemented it as governor falsely claiming the court forced you to?

4.How do you reconcile the fact that the majority of Americans claim to be pro-life with the fact that you, President Obama, support abortion on demand including even after a failed abortion and you, Mr. Romney, signed $50 co-pay taxpayer-funded elective surgical abortions into law as part of Romneycare (3 years AFTER your supposed “pro-life conversion”) and refused to sign the Susan B. Anthony and Personhood U.S.A pro-life pledges?

5.How do you reconcile the fact that the vast majority of Americans oppose laws that would force religious hospitals to violate their religious conscience by offering abortion services and distributing chemical abortion pills with the fact that you both forced Catholic Hospitals to do that very thing?

6.How can you reconcile the fact that the vast majority of Americans oppose homosexual adoptions, with the fact you support it, President Obama, and as governor, Mr. Romney, you forced Catholic Charities, the nation’s largest adoption and foster-care agency, to place children with same-sex couples or go out of business (which they eventually did?)

7.How can you both reconcile the fact that the vast majority of Americans feel that they are overtaxed with the fact that you support raising taxes (letting major portions of the Bush tax cuts expire), President Obama, and as governor, Mr. Romney, you opposed the Bush tax cuts and raised taxes and fees by close to a billion dollars which effectively, in addition to Romneycare, decimated the Massachusetts economy?

8.How can you both reconcile the fact that most Americans oppose homosexuals serving in the military with your opposition to “don’t ask don’t tell?”

9.How can you both reconcile the fact that most Americans oppose amnesty for illegals with your support, President Obama, for the DREAM ACT and your past support for McCain-Kennedy, Mr. Romney, as well as large parts of the DREAM ACT?

10.How can you reconcile the fact that the vast majority of Americans oppose homosexual, lesbian, and transgender “education” with the fact you support it, President Obama, and as governor, Mr. Romney, you sponsored and endorsed homosexual “pride” parades as well as boosted funding for homosexual “education” starting in kindergarten?

I’ve heard it thousands of times.

“Gregg, you wouldn’t vote for Jesus if he were running.”

“Gregg, there are no perfect candidates out there. You have to choose the lesser of two evils.”

The implication in both these statements in regards to the 2012 Presidential Election is that those who won’t vote for Romney are “purists” with unrealistically high expectations about their political candidates.

Sorry. But this is a straw man argument.

Neither I nor anybody I know who is not supporting Romney has ever said that there is a “perfect candidate.”

Of course, any candidate has cast a vote or taken a position in the past which not everybody will agree with.

But as far as I am concerned, there are some things which constitute immediate deal breakers. I am fine with a candidate who may differ with me on what type of tax policy we should have or how to regulate immigration or environmental policy. But when a candidate is consistently wrong on the fundamental issues of why government exists, the rule of law, the sanctity of human life, marriage and the natural human family, I have a major problem with that.

The reason I don’t support Mitt Romney is not because Mitt Romney “isn’t perfect” but because Mitt Romney has been consistently wrong on those fundamental issues listed above his entire career. (48 months as governor)

So I don’t think I am “demanding perfection” when I expect the president of the United States to understand the primary Biblical role of civil government and abide by it. Perhaps because Romney doesn’t believe the Bible to be authoritative, Romney doesn’t believe in the Biblical definition of civil government (i.e., that government exists to reward righteousness and punish evil.) If he did, he would not have used his civil magistrate authority as Governor of Massachusetts to implement “laws” and “executive directives” contrary to the laws of nature and Nature’s God (implementing homosexual “marriage,” subsidizing child murder at 50 bucks a pop, forcing Catholic Hospitals to issue chemical abortion pills even though they were legally exempt, boosting funding for homosexual and transgender “education” starting in kindergarten etc…)

I don’t think I am “demanding perfection” when I expect that the president of the United States abide by his sworn constitutional oath to enforce the Supreme Law of the Land. If one looks objectively at Romney’s actual record, one sees that Romney has spent his entire career in government violating his sworn oath by signing in “laws” contrary to God’s Divinely Revealed Law which, according to the Bible, Lex Rex, St. Thomas Aquinas, Locke, Blackstone, the Founders and Martin Luther King, is “no law at all.” (i.e., Romneycare, $50 abortions, homosexual “marriage,” forcing Catholic Hospitals to issue chemical abortion pills, forcing Catholic Charities to place children with same-sex couples, opposing bans on homosexual scoutmasters, etc…)

I don’t think I am “demanding perfection” when I expect the president of the United States to defend the inalienable right to life, God’s institution of marriage and the natural human family. Not only hasn’t Romney defended life and marriage, but he has actually done more to destroy them than any other governor in the history of the Republic. Romney single-handedly implemented same-sex “marriage” falsely claiming the court ordered him to and signed a quasi-Socialist healthcare plan into “law” with $50 tax-subsidized elective surgical abortions including “partial birth abortions” (again falsely claiming the courts made him do it.) Implementing same-sex “marriage” and $50 abortions are the things liberal Democrats only dream of doing. And Willard did it all in less than 4 years!

So look, I don’t expect “perfection” from anybody running for public office, because I recognize that the only perfect person to ever walk this earth was God Himself in human flesh, Jesus Christ.

But I do think it reasonable for me to expect that any candidate running for any public office at any level or branch of government actually understands and is able to articulate the primary purpose of civil government, abides by the law (insofar as it is in harmony with God’s Divinely Revealed Law or “the laws of nature and Nature’s God”) and will protect and defend the bedrock foundations of Western Civilization (life, marriage and the natural human family).

In other words, I am not expecting perfection but I am expecting a consistent track record of getting the major things listed above right. The way I see it, if you can’t get the major job requirements right, I can’t hire you for the job.

And in regard to getting it right on the major job requirements of being Chief Law Enforcement Officer, Commander and Chief and Leader of the Free World, Willard Mitchel Romney doesn’t even come close.

So let me get this straight…Conservatives like me are supposed to get excited about uber-liberal, pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, Crony Capitalist, Mitt Romney’s VP choice, Paul Ryan, who voted for Bush’s Medicare Part-D Prescription Drug Benefit, No Child Left Behind, TARP, both bailouts, NDAA (indefinite detention for Americans without due process), full funding for Obamacare and Barney Frank’s Emplyment Non-Descrimination Act (ENDA) which would financially penalize religious organizations for not hiring homosexuals and transvestites? Seriously?

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who designed and signed into law the very model for Obamacare and whose very own advisers actually helped craft Obamacare can be trusted to rescind Obamacare as president?

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who signed $50 co-pay elective surgical abortions into “law” and placed a Planned Parenthood board member on his “healthcare” advisory board (with no pro-life member) 3 years AFTER his supposed “pro-life conversion” and who refused to sign the Susan B. Anthony and Personhood U.S.A pro-life pledges will oppose child murder and enforce the inalienable right to life for all innocent human persons as president?

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally instituted same-sex “marriage” falsely claiming the court made him do it will fight to protect the God ordained institution of marriage if elected president?

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who supports state level ENDA laws that would force churches and other religious institutions to hire homosexuals, bi-sexuals and cross-dressers or pay a fine/go out of business and who sponsored and funded homosexual/transgender “Gay Pride” parades as governor and who opposes bans on openly homosexual scoutmasters and who increased funding for homosexual “education” starting in kindergarten will defend religious liberty and parents’ rights as president?

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who forced Catholic Hospitals to issue abortafascients in violation of Massachusetts Law which exempted religious hospitals is going to rescind federal laws that seek to impose similar mandates on religious hospitals nationwide?

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who supports the immoral, illegal and unconstitutional National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that was signed into law in the middle of the night on December 31, 2011 by Barack Obama that gives the president the power to detain and incarcerate any U.S. citizen without trial indefinitely is going to enforce the 4th, 5th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution?

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who signed into law as his “signature achievement” a quasi-socialist “healthcare” plan that was endorsed by Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Planned Parenthood and Barack Obama that includes $50 co-pay abortions and who raised taxes and fees by almost a billion dollars which decimated the Massachusetts economy and who opposed the Bush tax cuts will help create a conducive environment for economic growth as president?

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who passed over Republican lawyers for three quarters of the 36 judicial vacancies he faced and nominated 2 open homosexuals and who has promised to nominate more judges in the mold of Chief Justice Roberts will nominate righteous God fearing judges who will rule in accord with the Constitution and the “laws of nature and nature’s God?”

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who supported Lieberman-McCain “cap and trade” will as president oppose it?

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who supports “comprehensive immigration reform” (i.e., amnesty) and who supported Bush-Kennedy-McCain amnesty will be tough on illegal immigration as president?

Is it not utterly absurd to think that the man who supports unconstitutional gun control laws such as the Assault Weapons Ban and Brady Bill and who bragged about the “severely restrictive gun laws” he was partially responsible for in Massachusetts will defend the 2nd Amendment as president?

Oh, my bad, I forgot…Romney is a Republican and Obama is a Democrat.

What was I thinking about?

Ok…Must remember what Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity tell me…

“Republican good. Democrat bad.”

“Republican good. Democrat bad.”

“Republican good. Democrat bad.”

“My baby-killing, pro-homosexual, crypto-socialist, crony capitalist RINO is better than your baby-killing, pro-homosexual, crypto-socialist, crony capitalist Democrat.”

“Romney good. Obama bad.”

“Romney good…”

The most frequent question I have been asked in interviews discussing my new book co-authored with nationally syndicated radio host, Steve Deace, We Won’t Get Fooled Again: Where the Christian Right Went Wrong and How to Make America Right Again, is whether or not a Christian can support Mitt Romney if he becomes the GOP nominee.

As somebody who covered Mitt Romney on the radio in Boston when he was governor, I know too much about his pro-abortion,pro-homosexual “marriage,” pro-Big Government far left wing record to vote for him. But I would not condemn anybody else who chooses to given the fact that the current occupant in the White House is clearly hell bent on destroying any vestige of what currently is left of America.

Frequently, the questioner will respond that despite Romney’s liberal record that he won’t be as bad as Obama and that we need to support “anybody but Obama.”

While that may or may not be true, (I think a valid argument that a Romney presidency would actually be far worse for America)there are certain non-negotiables that, in my opinion, disqualify any candidate running for any public office but especially the presidency.

Here are 10 questions that I recommend posing to any candidate for whom you may be considering voting. As far as I am concerned, if they can’t answer these fundamental foundational questions concerning civil government and the rule-of-law correctly they are not qualified for any public office in any branch and at any level of government.

1. Do all of our rights come from God? (If “no” then candidate disqualified.”)

2. Is the primary purpose of civil government to protect inalienable rights? (If “no” then candidate disqualified.

3. Is the Supreme Court the final arbiter of what is/isn’t constitutional/legal? (If “yes” then candidate disqualified.)

4. Is Roe v. Wade the “law of the land?” (If “yes” then candidate disqualified.)

5. Do governors and presidents (and all other civil magistrates) have a constitutional obligation to ignore unconstitutional court opinions such as Roe, Kelo, Lawrence, Goodridge, California re:Marriage,Varnum, etc…? (If “no” then candidate disqualified.)

6. Is the inalienable right to life from conception to natural death the most fundamental right we as human beings possess? (If “no”then candidate disqualified.)

7. Does the president possess the Constitutional obligation, as the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States of America, to enforce the inalienable right to life (as guaranteed in the 5th and14th Amendments) for all innocent human persons from conception to natural death when individual states fail to do so? (If “no” then candidate disqualified.)

8. Do state governors, possess the Constitutional obligation, as the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of their individual sovereign state, to enforce the inalienable right to life (as guaranteed in the 5th and 14th Amendments) for all innocent human persons from conception to natural death? (If “no” then candidate disqualified.)

7. Can any law contrary to God’s Natural Law ever be constitutional or legal? (If “yes” then candidate disqualified.)

8. Can “homosexual marriage” or child murder by abortion ever be legal even if “voter approved” since no law contrary to God’s Natural Law can ever be “legal?” (If “yes” then candidate disqualified.)

9. Can any bill that ends with the 6 words, “then you can kill the baby” such as the “ban” on partial birth abortion (which has never actually banned the procedure and never saved even 1 baby despite raising a quarter of a billion dollars for many of the leading “Christian” and “conservative”pro-life, pro family and legal organizations) ever be considered “pro-lifelegislation?” (If “yes” then candidate disqualified.)

10. Will you advance/support state/federal Personhood Human Life Amendment to the Constitution that would outlaw all abortions from the very moment of conception since Personhood (written into the GOP platform by Ronald Reagan) is the core plank of the GOP platform? (If “no” then candidate disqualified.)

Some may call me a “purist” for setting such unreasonably high standards and focusing too narrowly on “social issues.” But I don’t think it’s unreasonable or “puritanical” for “we the people” to merely expect that our elected public officials be able to articulate who the Supreme Law giver is, what civil government’s central purpose is, and the role and enumerated limitations of each of the 3 branches of government.

Pretty basic Civics 101 stuff.

No?

If conservative Christians want authentically pro-life,pro-family, pro-rule of law representatives, isn’t it up to “we the people” to hold them accountable to ensure they uphold their sworn Constitutional oaths? Isn’t that the main requirement for self-government?

At the end of the day, if we have immoral and compromised politicians in office, we must acknowledge that we bear a significant portion of the blame for placing them in power, knowing even before we pull the lever for them, that they have no intention of abiding by their oaths of office based on their own records and public statements.

Do we not?

Poll after poll has demonstrated extremely high voter discontentment with both the current occupant of the White House, Barack Hussein Obama (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro), and his likely establishment backed GOP challenger, Willard Mitchell Romney.

Question: Could the reason that voters dislike both men with such intensity have anything to do with the fact that both men’s virtually indistinguishable records and positions are so far to the left of the American mainstream?

After all:

One man believes he will become god of his own planet some day and the other thinks he already is.

One man seeks to establish government run healthcare with individual mandates. The other actually accomplished it on the state level and had some of his very own consultants help design the federal program currently being debated at the Supreme Court.

One man seeks to implement government funded tax-subsidized abortion on demand. The other actually did it at the state level as part of his “healthcare” plan that was endorsed by Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton and Planned Parenthood.

One man says he opposes same-sex “marriage” but has signaled he will attempt to implement it in a second term. The other has already unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally implemented it on the state level as governor.

One man supports special rights for homosexuals, lesbians and transgenders. As governor the other boosted funding for homosexual and transgender “education” starting in kindergarten, sponsored “youth gay pride parades,” supports ENDA laws that would force religious institutions to hire homosexuals and transvestites or be fined or forced out of business, and forced the nation’s largest adoptive and foster care agency, Catholic Charities, to place children with same-sex couples even though he was not required to by law.

One man recently attempted to mandate that religious institutions cover contraception including “emergency contraception” (chemical abortion pills). The other one did it 3 years AFTER his supposed “pro-life conversion” even though Catholic Hospitals were legally exempt.

One man wants to roll back the Bush Tax Cuts for the “wealthy.” The other opposed the Bush Tax Cuts, supports raising taxes on the “wealthy,” and raised taxes and fees by close to a billion dollars as governor which decimated the economy of the small New England state he governed.

So the question so many have is whether there is an alternative to the two men we are told daily by the establishment media and elite political class are our only two choices for president.

“Pro-abort, pro-homosexual, pro-bailouts/govt run healthcare, corporatist candidate A” or “Pro-abort, pro-homosexual, pro-bailouts/govt run healthcare, corporatist candidate B.”

Pick your poison…

Demican or Republicrat…

I have a feeling if there were ever a year when truly independent citizen candidates could mount a substantive and authentic challenge to the mostly hand picked establishment candidates from the two parties at every branch and level of government, 2012 may be that year.

Perhaps voters not willing to accept the premise that we must choose between “establishment candidate A” and “establishment candidate B” may have other alternatives?

Here are two (Laurie Roth and Tom Hoefling) that are running for president who are both solidly pro-life, pro-marriage, pro-rule of law Constitutional Christian Conservatives who appear to fit that description.

I have a feeling there will be other independent grass roots Christian Conservative candidates running for other elected offices at all levels of government as well.

The question is whether enough voters are willing to place principle over party.

We will see in the coming months.

1. All office holders at every level and every branch of government swear an oath to God to uphold the Supreme Law of the Land, The United States Constitution?

2. Laws such as Obamcare/Romneycare or court opinions such as Roe v Wade/Goodridge which are contrary to the Constitution and the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” are legally null and void and should be ignored by all office holders at every level and every branch of government?

3. All office holders at every level and every branch of government have the Constitutional duty to ignore unconstitutional and illegal laws such as Obamacare/Romneycare and court opinions such as Roe/Goodridge? (Goodridge was the 2004 court opinion Romney falsely claimed forced him to alter and issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in Massachusetts.)

4. Any office holders at any level and any branch of government who treat unconstitutional laws and court opinions as constitutional and legally binding are in direct violation of their oath of office and should be impeached/removed from office?

If you (correctly) answered “true” to all 4 questions then you have just disqualified the current occupant of the White House Barack Obama (a.k.a Barry Soetoro) and current GOP “front runner” (Willard Mitchel Romney) from holding any public office at any level and any branch of government.

The same could be said of virtually every state governor and every state/federal level legislator in our nation.

If Mitt Romney wins the GOP nomination and runs against the current occupant of the White House, Barack Hussein Obama, will voters really have a choice?

After all:

Obama supports abortion on demand. Romney signed $50 co-pay abortions into law (3 yrs AFTER his supposed pro-life conversion).

Obama supports socialized healthcare. Romney signed Planned Parenthood-Ted Kennedy-Hillary Clinton endorsed Romneycare (which now includes free abortion coverage) into law that was used as the model for Obamacare.

Obama supports “civil unions” and claims to oppose same-sex “marriage.” Romney actually implemented same-sex “marriage” falsely claiming the court “ordered” him to authorize alterations to and issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Obama supports homosexual and transgender “education.” Romney boosted funding for homosexual and transgender education starting in kindergarten and endorsed “youth gay pride” events by issuing proclamations of support.

Obama supports forcing Christian hospitals to issue chemical abortion “emergency contraception.” Romney was the first governor in the history of the Republic to force Catholic Hospitals to issue chemical abortion pills even though they were exempt by law.

Obama supports forcing religious adoptive and foster care organizations to place children with same-sex couples. Romney forced Catholic Charities, the nation’s largest adoptive and fostercare placement organization to place children with homosexual couples or go out of business which they eventually did.

Obama opposes bans on homosexual scoutmasters. So does Romney.

Obama supports Employment Non Discrimination Laws (ENDA) that would force private religious organizations to hire homosexuals and transgenders or be fined or closed down. So does Romney.

Obama supports promotion of liberal judges to the courts. Romney passed over Republican lawyers for three quarters of the 36 judicial vacancies he faced and nominated 2 open homosexuals.

Obama criticized Joint Chief’s of Staff, Peter Pace for saying that homosexual acts were “immoral.” So did Romney.

Obama supports restrictive gun control laws. Romney does too.

Obama believes in man-made “global warming” and supported McCain-Lieberman “cap and trade.” So did Romney.

Obama supports “comprehensive immigration reform” (i.e., amnesty). Romney supported Bush-McCain-Kennedy amnesty.

Obama supports raising taxes on “the rich.” Romney opposed the Bush Tax Cuts which earned him praise from Barney Frank, raised taxes and fees by a billion dollars and instituted a socialist healthcare plan that has decimated the Massachusetts economy.

All proof source links here