Archive for the ‘Judicial Supremacy’ Category

Supreme Court Right On Texas Abortion Law But For Wrong Reasons

Tuesday, June 28th, 2016
The Supreme Court issued an opinion today that a Texas law requiring abortionists be hospital licensed to be unconstitutional. Reagan appointee Anthony Kennedy (the gift the keeps on giving) joined the other 4 leftists on the court in their majority opinion (authored by Steven Breyer) that:
We agree with the District Court that the surgical-center requirement, like the admitting-privileges requirement, provides few, if any, health benefits for women, poses a substantial obstacle to women seeking abortions, and constitutes an "undue burden" on their constitutional right to do so.
The majority opinion was correct. But for all the wrong reasons. The Texas law wasn't unconstitutional because of the ludicrous requirement that baby butchers be properly credentialed by hospitals. The Texas law was unconstitutional because there is no Constitutional right to murder pre-born human persons at any stage of development since Roe v Wade is not the "law of the land" and never has been and allowing any type of abortion-related "procedure" violates the inalienable right to life for all innocent human persons from conception to natural death per the explicit and imperative requirements of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution which guarantees that no state shall violate "due process" and "equal protection of the laws" for any person without exception. No state possesses the authority to alienate inalienable rights. What is so sad is that so many self-described "constitutional conservatives" swallow and perpetuate the toxic liberal lie of Judicial Supremacy (i.e., that court opinions are the "law of the land" the very instant they are issued and must be obeyed, no matter how immoral, wicked or unconstitutional, by the other two superior branches.) And if you doubt the Founders originally designed the judiciary to be the "weakest of the 3 branches" read "Federalist 78" by Alexander Hamilton. The bottom line is that, ultimately, the Governor of Texas, Republican Greg Abbott, is the chief law enforcement officer of the state of Texas and is primarily responsible for ensuring that the Federal and Texas state Constitutions' "equal protection" and "due process" guarantees be faithfully enforced and applied to every innocent human person in the state of Texas (no matter how tiny)...without exception! Babies are dying daily in Texas because Governor Abbott daily permits it (as do all 49 other state governors). We should expect immoral, illegal and anti-Constitutional opinions from the (majority) leftist Supreme Court. But is it too much to expect that self-professing "pro-life constitutional conservative Christians" such as Abbott actually abide by their oath and DO THEIR JOB especially when it comes to protecting and defending the most sacred right all human beings possess? The right to their own lives?
"To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. ...The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots." (Thomas Jefferson)
“...the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution. … [T]he judiciary … has no influence over either the sword or purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL..." (Alexander Hamilton)
“..if the policy of the government, upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made, in ordinary litigation between parties, in personal actions, the people will have ceased, to be their own rulers, having, to that extent, practically resigned their government, into the hands of that eminent tribunal.” (Abraham Lincoln)

The President’s One and Only Duty Regarding Abortion

Sunday, February 7th, 2016
At the New Hampshire GOP debate last night, all the GOP candidates claimed to be "pro-life with exceptions" (i.e., life of mother, rape and incest, etc...). Some, such as Marco Rubio even pledged to sign legislation banning all abortions except the life and health of the mother. Unfortunately, not one of the candidates gave the right answer regarding the proper duty of the president regarding abortion (child murder). Not one single candidate explained what the one and only moral, legal and constitutional duty of the chief law enforcement officer of the United States is. The president has the duty to ignore/reject Roe (and all other unconstitutional court opinions) and enforce the pre-existent God given right to life for ALL innocent human persons in every state that fails to do so per the explicit provisions of the 5th and 14th Amendment's equal protection and due process guarantees. WITHOUT EXCEPTION! There is never a case when a physician ever has to intentionally murder a pre-born baby to preserve the life of the mother. Even C Everett Koop admitted that before Congress and I document it in my book "Conservative Comebacks to Liberal Lies." The physician/obstetrician has a duty to attempt to preserve the life of both the mother and the child. Unfortunately many "pro-life" Republicans perpetuate this leftist talking point to make themselves appear to be less extreme and and more moderate and reasoned on the issue. Sadly, (at this point) none of the GOP candidates will abide by the oath to protect the God given right to life for ALL and end the Abortion Holocaust in America as Governor Huckabee has pledged to do. Even Reagan was derelict in his duty to enforce the 5th and 14th Amendments allowing millions of tiny babies to be murdered in 8 years he was chief law enforcement officer... Hoping and praying at least one candidate will pledge to ignore Roe and enforce the 5th and 14th Amendments and end the Abortion Holocaust in America that has taken the lives of 60,000,000 tiny babies in our country.

How America Could Restore Constitutional 3 Branch Government and The Rule of Law Virtually Overnight…

Sunday, September 27th, 2015
Many are celebrating The Governor of Texas' recently issued exemption for Christians whose religious conscience won't allow them to take part in so called same-sex unions. Ironically, in his statement, Republican Governor Abbott acknowledges that the Obergefell opinion isn't law and doesn't trump the 1st Amendment. But what he flagrantly failed to mention was that the immoral, illegal and unconstitutional Obergefell opinion (that there is a Constitutional right to so-called same-sex marriage) is not "the law of the land" and doesn't trump or invalidate in any way the Texas marriage statutes, Texas Constitution and God's Immutable and Infallible Word (which ALL define marriage as the exclusive union of one man and one woman). Allowing marriage licenses to be illegally altered and issued to same-sex couples in Texas is not a "victory for religious liberty." It's a massive defeat for the Constitutional Rule of Law and what remains of our Republican form of Civil Government. If Americans truly want to restore Constitutional Checks and Balances and the Rule of Law, we must demolish the toxic liberal lie of Judicial Supremacy (that Rule of Judges equal the Rule of Law). And that has the best chance of occurring at the state level. Here is what Governor Abbott of Texas should have said:
"The Supreme Court is not the Supreme Being. As governor I have a solemn obligation to enforce the laws and statutes of the state of Texas in obedience to the Texas and U.S. Constitutions. The marriage statutes in Texas and our Constitution limit marriage to one man and one woman in accordance with God's Word and can never be amended or altered in any way. Therefore, I will not enforce the immoral and unconstitutional Obergefell opinion and will not authorize any alterations to or issuance of marriage licenses to same sex couples in Texas. This is not as much an issue of religious liberty as it is an issue of the preservation of the Rule of Law. And here in Texas, Constitutional oaths and the Rule of Law still matter and I will not violate my oath. And in addition to not authorizing the issuance of marriage licenses to same sex couples in Texas, I will also be shutting down all Planned Parenthood Abortuaries in Texas since killing pre-born babies blatantly violates the 5th and 14th amendments which both guarantee that all innocent human persons not be deprived of due process and equal protection of the laws. Neither Roe nor Obergefell are the "law of the land" and here in Texas I as governor will protect marriage and life and reject them both as the legal nullities they are. Period!"

5 Takeaways From The Ongoing Persecution of Kim Davis

Wednesday, September 9th, 2015
The freeing of Kim Davis by Judge Bunning who illegally imprisoned Kim is an enormously significant event that can't be underscored. It has demonstrated: 1. That the federal Judge Bunning knew he had overstepped his authority by ordering Kim to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples and had no legal or constitutional authority to do so. (And should be punished/removed from office/disbarred and forced to pay restitution to Kim for his illegal actions.) 2. That Kim was the one abiding by the law and her sworn oath all along by refusing to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples in Kentucky which would have violated the state marriage statutes limiting marriage to 1 man and 1 woman. If this were not true, the judge would never have let her out:-) 3. That illegal, immoral and unconstitutional court opinions are not law and don't super-cede/revoke/"strike down" constitutionally valid laws and statutes. Judicial Supremacy is a big fat lie. Supreme Court opinions only have legal merit to the extent they accord with the Constitution and ultimately with the "laws of nature and nature's God." Any law or court opinion (Roe, Lawrence, Dred Scott, Obergefell) contrary to God's Law is no law at all! They are all legal nullities and are required to be treated as such! The legislative and executive branches have the solemn DUTY to ignore/reject ALL unconstitutional court opinions without exception. (Checks and balances). 4. That all marriage licenses issued to same sex couples in Kentucky regardless of who signs them are legally null and void since the Kentucky marriage statutes strictly limit marriage to one man and one woman in accordance with God's Word (marriage is the exclusive union of one man and one woman which can never be redefined by any court, legislature or majority of voters and are therefore legally null and void in all 50 states where they are being issued!) 5. That Kim Davis has set the standard and should be a role model for every civil magistrate at every level and branch of government to ignore/reject unconstitutional court orders, opinions and laws per their sworn Constitutional oaths!

The Founding Fathers Agree With Kim Davis 100%

Sunday, September 6th, 2015
Many self-described conservatives are claiming that Kentucky marriage clerk Kim Davis should either "follow the law" and issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples or "find another job" since, of course, the Obergefell opinion that there is a supposed Constitutional right to so-called "same-sex marriage" is now the "law of the land." (At least according to the Bush appointee federal judge who threw Kim Davis in jail for not agreeing to violate her oath and also according to all the Judicial Supremacist blond bimbos and talking heads over at Faux News) Jefferson, Hamilton, and Lincoln, however, would beg to differ (by their own words below) with the toxic liberal lie that Supreme Court (SC) opinions immediately and without exception "invalidate" Constitutionally enacted laws and statutes. The SC is not King and their opinions aren't the "law of the land" the very moment they are issued. We have flouted the grave warnings of the likes of Thomas Jefferson, who wrote:
To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. ...The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots.
Not even Hamilton imagined that the right to opine is a power to rule. Courts, he pointed out, have intentionally been given no means of enforcing their opinions -- making it obvious that the executive and legislative branches are not compelled to "obey" false or even dubious opinions. Therefore, he wrote:
“...the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution. … [T]he judiciary … has no influence over either the sword or purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL..."
Lincoln acknowledged that court opinions are binding on the specific parties named and “entitled to very high respect and consideration (by) other departments of the government.” But like the Founding Fathers, he utterly rejected the claim that judges' opinions are the law of the land:
“..if the policy of the government, upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made, in ordinary litigation between parties, in personal actions, the people will have ceased, to be their own rulers, having, to that extent, practically resigned their government, into the hands of that eminent tribunal.”
Americans must reject the Orwellian Lie that is cancelling self-government in the United States. Lincoln said on the battlefield at Gettysburg:
“Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether … any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure... It is for us the living...to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us… we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”
The Supreme Court issues administrative opinions that the other two superior branches (legislative and executive) should strongly consider. But any change in the laws must be made via the Constitutionally proscribed process (by the legislative branch and signed into law by the executive.) Judicial opinions are only legally binding on the parties in the case being heard in so far as they comply with the Constitution. Any law or court opinion contrary to the Constitution is legally null and void on its face and must be ignored and rejected by every civil magistrate at every level and branch of government. The problem is that many Americans have been brainwashed to believe the lie that COTUS and POTUS must always obey SCOTUS no matter how immoral, illegal and unconstitutional their opinions may be. The truth is that COTUS and POTUS and every civil magistrate at every level and branch of government has a moral and Constitutional duty (per the oath they swear)to ignore/reject ALL anti-Constitutional court opinions. (Such as Obergefell for example) The Supreme Court is no more "supreme" over the other 2 branches or the people than the Federal Reserve or Federal Express is part of the Federal Government. The Framers intentionally designed the Judiciary to be "the weakest of the 3 branches" for a reason. (See Federalist #78 for more). The Democrat governor of Kentucky is blatantly violating his oath by allowing marriage licenses to be issued (and illegally altered) to same sex couples since the marriage statutes in Kentucky have never been altered or amended in any way and still limit marriage to one man and one woman. And every single marriage licence that has been issued to a same-sex couple in Kentucky is legally null and void. He is the one who should be in jail. Not Kim Davis who has a far superior understanding of the oath of office, the rule of law, our Constitutional Republican form of government and God's Immutable Word than 99.9% of our elected representatives. (including virtually every GOP presidential candidate) All unconstitutional judicial opinions must be ignored and rejected by every civil magistrate at every level and branch of government. Period! Roe should have been. Lawrence should have been. Dred Scott should have been. And Obergefell should be ignored and rejected by every governor of every sovereign state in the union for the immoral and unconstitutional abomination it is. That is how our Representative Republican form of government was originally designed to work. Ever hear of the term "checks and balances?" Sadly, all 50 governors are violating their oaths by treating a toothless and totally immoral opinion as if it were the "law of the land" by issuing marriage licences to same sex couples despite the fact the SC can't make, amend or "overturn" laws and in spite of the fact that in virtually every state in the Union, the Constitutionally enacted marriage statutes still define marriage as the exclusive union of one man and one woman AND in spite of the fact that no majority of jurists, legislators or voters possesses the authority to re-define what God Almighty Himself has once for all explicitly ordained, defined, and established (i.e., that marriage is the EXCLUSIVE union of one man and one woman!) Including the state of Kentucky where the marriage statute that limits marriage as the union of one man and one woman is still the "law of the land!" Gregg Jackson is the author of the new book "40 Things to Teach Your Children Before You Die: The Simple American Truths About Life, Family & Faith" (Dunham Books)