Having said that I have been extremely disappointed to witness Focus compromising on the most vital social/moral issues of our time in the name of political pragmatism.

Former president James Dobson recently admitted losing the culture war.

Dobson admitted that the “ban on partial birth abortion” that he initially applauded “does not save a single human life” in spite of the fact that the pro-life and pro-family industry, including Focus, raised a quarter of a billion dollars fundraising off it.

Dobson promised he would never vote for anybody who would ever support any level of abortion and then reneged on his solemn pledge by endorsing pro-choice for states John McCain for President.

Dobson called the man who single-handedly instituted (illegally) sodomy “marriage” and signed into law $50 co-pay tax-funded elective surgical abortion on demand (Mitt Romney) a man who “pro-family voters could support.”

Focus’ Tom Minnery claimed that there is a biblical basis for supporting candidates who are the “lesser of two evils” even if they support abortion or homosexual “marriage.”

And now here in Colorado in less than 60 days, voters will go to the polls to vote on Amendment 62 which would end baby killing in our state by enshrining into our state Constitution that “… the term ‘person’ shall apply to every human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being.”

And I have not heard America’s largest Christian pro-family organization (located in Colorado Springs Colorado by the way) utter a word of support for a constitutional amendment in their own state which would end child murder.

Now I know that Dr. Dobson personally signed the petition to support Personhood and that President of Focus, Jim Daly, has supposedly stated that he and Focus plan on endorsing Personhood and that they would be “sending out an e-mail” to their donors at some point to show their support.

But I would hope that the leading Christian pro-family organization in the country would do more than talk about “sending out an e-mail” to their donors.

What could be more important right now for Focus to be focusing on?

I’m sorry but is there a more pressing issue for Focus right now than getting behind a Constitutional Amendment that would end child murder where it all began?

Who could be a more susceptible member of any family than a baby in the womb?

I would hope that in the 2 months preceding the vote on Amendment 62, that Focus would not only endorse Personhood but they would join and help lead the battle.

Leading abortion groups such as Planned Parenthood are spending millions to defeat Amendment 62 and Focus could easily help raise the necessary awareness and money to help ensure passage.

If I were Jim Daly I would not cover anything other than Amendment 62 from now until the election building awareness, educating and raising the necessary money to ensure victory at the polls.

I can’t imagine Amendment 62 being defeated if Focus leveraged its vast resources, infrastructure, donor base and listeners to get behind it.

If I were Jim Daly, I would argue that Focus on the Family exists first and foremost to protect families especially the most innocent and defenseless members of the natural human family…babies in the womb and that nothing could be more important to Focus than doing everything humanly possible to help pass Amendment 62 as the first of many Personhood Amendments in states across the country.

I know that Focus and Jim Daly believe that Christians should be heavily involved in public policy. I just heard Mr. Daly say so on the radio last week during an interview with former Senator Rick Santorum.

I ask you Jim Daly, what more important “public policy” battle could there possibly be than taking a lead role here in your home state of Colorado to end child murder?

Hoping and praying Daly/Focus join the battle in helping to end the shedding of innocent blood…
I know one thing for sure, if Amendment 62 is defeated, it will, in large part be due to Focus’ lack of support.

To whom much is given, much will be required…

Point#1: The past 3-decade strategy of electing more Republicans to appoint more “pro-life” and “pro-family” judges has been a total unmitigated failure.

• 60 % of federal judiciary (who gave us Roe, Lawrence, Goodridge) are GOP appointees including homosexual liberal activist San Francisco Judge Vaughn Walker who recently issued the totally unconstitutional and absurd opinion that limiting marriage to one man and one woman to be “unconstitutional” who was a Regan and Bush appointee.

• Not 1 single solitary U.S. Supreme Court Justice (including “conservative” and “pro-life” “strict constructionists” Alito, Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, Kennedy) has ever written or stated that babies in the womb are human persons who possess an inalienable right to life under the 5th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Not one! We don’t need “1 more judge to overturn Roe.” We need 5 more!

The vast majority of GOP appointed judges are secular humanistic legal positivists who believe that the law is what the judges say it is.

Point #2: Judges can’t “strike down” or “overturn” any law, statute or constitutional amendment. The judiciary may opine on individual cases before them but their rulings are merely binding (if in accordance with the plain language of the Constitution) on the parties involved in the lawsuit. But a judge’s opinion can’t, in any way, change, alter or overturn any individual law, statute or constitutional amendment. Judges possess “neither the power of the sword nor the purse.” (Federalist 78) All legislative powers belong to the sovereign people of California. The only way that a constitutional amendment may be changed is by the people or via their elected representatives. Prop 8 is the Supreme Law of the Land and cannot be “overturned” by judicial fiat.

Point #3: Judge Walker’s unconstitutional opinion that homosexuals possess a constitutional right to marry is totally absurd and anti-Constitutional. And Judge Walker should be impeached immediately for violating his oath to uphold and defend the constitution.

Point #4: It doesn’t matter how the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rules in this case since Walker’s opinion is null and void since it is so obviously anti-Constitutional.

Point #5: If Governor Schwarzenegger (again) illegally authorizes changes to and issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples without a legally binding, accompanying, enabling statute, he should be impeached for violating his oath to uphold and defend the constitution by enforcing a judge’s unconstitutional court opinion as if it were actual law.

Point #6: Homosexual “marriage” can never be “legal” (even if passed by the voters or legislators) since any law contrary to God’s Natural Law is no law at all. (To quote Dr. Martin Luther King). We as Christians will never acknowledge the “legality” of homosexual “marriage” (or killing innocent children in the womb for that matter) regardless if a majority of voters or some black robed judge says it’s ok.

Point #7: Governors Romney, Schwarzenegger, and Culver all violated their sworn oaths by unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally authorizing alterations to and issuance of marriage licenses to homosexual couples (falsely claiming “the judges made them do it” and should all be removed from office (w/ exception of Romney who is already out of office but who many believe can still be charged with perjury) and the marriage licenses declared null and void in each of those states (Mass, CA and Iowa).

Peter and the other apostles replied: “We must obey God rather than men!” Acts 5:29

Post script: I originally neglected to make clear that not all conservative and Christian groups are guilty of perpetuating the toxic liberal lie that judges possess the authority to amend, alter and change laws and constitutions and the losing strategy of blindly electing more Republicans under the false hope that they will nomiate the “right” judges etc…There is at least one principled conservative organization who is the rare exception to the rule…America’s Independent Party. My sincere apologies for painting with too broad a brush.

What is this guy the Emperor of California?

This is Groundhog Day all over again.

As I have written numerous times on this site, judges can’t make law!

Prop 8 which amended the California Constitution limiting marriage to one man-one woman can’t, according to the Supreme Law of California, the California Constitution, be “overturned,” “struck down” or “repealed” but by another constitutional amendment passed by the sovereign people of the state of California.

Furthermore, marriage licences can’t be altered in any way or issued to same sex couples without a binding, enabling, accompanying statute.

And the law has not changed and can’t no matter what sodomite judges in San Francisco say.

Once again, Governor Schwarzenegger is staying true to his father’s Nazi colors by promising to authorize the changes to and issuance of marriage licenses to same sex couples in direct violation of his oath to uphold the California Constitution and only enforce and administer the laws and statutes on the books in California (as opposed to a judge’s illegal and unconstitutional pronouncement).

And sadly enough, once again, our leading “Christian” and “conservative” leaders and organizations such as Focus on the Family, ACLJ, Pacific Justice, AFA, Liberty, ADF, FRC etc…, will cede the toxic liberal lie that courts can make law. None of these “watchdog” organizations and organizational leaders held Mitt Romney responsible when he unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally instituted same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts. In fact many of them supported or endorsed him for president of the United States. And none of these groups held Governor Schwarzenegger responsible for pulling a Romney when he initially authorized the 20,000 plus marriage licenses to be illegally altered and issued to homosexual couples from California two years ago.

And sadly enough, all of these groups have complained about “judicial tyranny” and have sent out donation letters and e-mails begging for money to “fight this battle in court” instead of drawing attention to the obvious fact that the executive branch may never enforce a judges opinion in an individual matter before him and that, by doing just that, Schwarzenegger is violating his oath and the inalienable right of the sovereign people of California to govern themselves.

As the founder of the “conservative and Christian right” in America, Paul Weyrich wrote (which was ghost written by Oxford educated, John Haskins) shortly before he died a few years ago:

Lincoln acknowledged that court opinions are binding on the specific parties named and “entitled to very high respect and consideration (by) other departments of the government.” But like the Founding Fathers, he utterly rejected the claim that judges’ opinions are the law of the land:

“..if the policy of the government, upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made, in ordinary litigation between parties, in personal actions, the people will have ceased, to be their own rulers, having, to that extent, practically resigned their government, into the hands of that eminent tribunal.”

The sad reality is that we get “judicial tyranny” because we (Christians and conservatives) have allowed the judiciary to excercise constitutional legislative powers they don’t possess.

Our leading “conservative” and “Christian” organizations and leaders continue to score goals for the other team.

Here we go again.

Most headlines cite how Judge Walker “struck down” the so-called “gay marriage ban.”

For starters, judges can’t “strike down” any law whether it be a statute or constitutional amendment such as Prop 8. And it is a shame that so many “conservative” lawyers continue to parrot this toxic liberal lie. Judges may hear individual cases and rule on them as long as they have jurisdiction. But judges don’t possess any legislative authority. Period!

The judge did have subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case and issue a ruling. But a judge’s opinion isn’t law.

The only way the actual constitutional amendment, Prop 8,may be altered or overturned in any way is via another constitutional amendment, according to the California Constitution itself. Only the voters may revoke or overturn a constitutional amendment or initiative statute.

Thus, one man-one woman marriage is still the law of the land unless and until the voters amend the constitution to revoke it.

Schwarzennegger already pulled a “Mitt Romney” once by unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally authorizing changes to and issuance of marriage licenses without a binding, enabling, accompanying statute in direct violation of his constitutionally sworn oath to enforce the law (as opposed to unconstitutional court opinions).

For that every pro-family Christian legal organization in America should have called for The Gilie-Man’s impeachment. (Which none of them did since almost all of them from Liberty Council to the ACLJ to ADF believe the lie that judges actually can make law).

If Schwarzenegger again falsely claims that a judge’s utterly absurd opinion that a constitutional amendment is “unconstitutional,” which it OBVIOUSLY isn’t since the generally accepted definition of marriage has always been understood to be exclusive to one man-one woman, he should, without a doubt, be impeached for failing to enforce the law…which has still not changed and still limits marriage to one man-one woman in the state of California!

I am not surprised that this homosexual activist liberal Judge Walker issued this totally absurd unconstitutional opinion.

After all, that’s what activist liberal homosexual activist judges do.

And I predicted that this is exaclty what would happen in a post I wrote on Feb 14th of this year.

But sadder and more frustrating to me is that fact that our so-called “Christian” “conservative” “constitutionalist” lawyers, pro-family leaders, pundits and politicians will almost without exception cede and perpetuate the toxic liberal lie that the judge “struck down” the marriage amendment and that the only recourse is to fight it out in court instead of calling on Scwarzegger to uphold his oath and ignore the activist and totally unconstitutional ruling as is Scwarzenegger’s solemn duty as the chief law enforcement officer of the state of California.

The reason that liberal judges are able to “legislate from the bench” and “strike down laws” with impugnity is because “conservatives” have speciously conceded the lie that they possess the right to do so.

Is there not one single Christian conservative leader who will denounce this joke of a ruling as the legally null and void farce that it obviously is and demand that Governor Swarzenegger uphold his sworn oath and ignore it?

Obviously pro-homosexual, pro-abortion, “conservative” “Republican” Aaanald, will never uphold the Constitution (since we know liberals instinctively loathe the Supreme Law of the Land).

But wouldn’t it be nice if even one “rule of law conservative” at least attempted to demand that the rule of law actually be upheld instead of ceding imaginary powers the judiciary doesn’t possess?

One of the counterfeit “pro-family” “Christian” groups I cited was Jay Sekulow’s American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ.)

Minutes after I sent out the post to over 500 consevative and Christian pro-family and pro-life lawyers, leaders and pundits, I received an indignant request from Jay’s son, Jordan Sekulow to be “removed from the list.”

I don’t believe that I have to add to our subsequent exchange below.

I believe it is pretty self-explanatory…

As you read our exchange, ask yourself if you consider yourself to be a pro-life, pro-family constitutional Christian conservative if the Sekulow’s represent your core values and beliefs…

Jordan Sekulow

Remove me from the list Gregg

And by the way, we were against the Stupak compromise deal - very clearly, do some research Gregg - I know you have the time on your hands…

Me: No, Jordan.

You were copied for a reason. You are not on a “list.” And I won’t stop cc’ing you when I feel it is appropriate irregardless of your indignant and petulant requests.

I know this post I wrote must hit close to home since you worked for the man who unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally implemented sodomy-based “marriage” and signed into law $50 abortions (2 years AFTER his “pro-life conversion.”) Mitt Romney. His entire fully documented far left wing record is documented here. http://greggjackson.com/blog/?p=471 Anything not accurate in it, Jordan? How could you and your dad continue to support this man who signed the death warrants of thousands of babies in Massachusetts at $50 dollars each and claim to be a “pro-family Christian” as you and your dad claim?

And what reason do you have to be critical of ObamaCare’s subsidization of abortion given the fact that you are a proud supporter of the man who ushered in tax subsidized elective surgical abortions into law in his quasi-socialist healthcare plan, Mitt Romney?

P.S. As to your little snide comment about my having so much “time on my hands”: I actually don’t as I am keeping myself quite busy, you’ll be pleased to know, writing my next book on the counterfeit conservative and Christian movement in America and you and your father will have your own chapter dedicated to you so all grassroots Christians and conservatives can learn the truth about how you have lied and deceived millions (like when you both portrayed Mitt Romney as a pro-life, pro-family conservative for example) while you simultaneously enriched yourselves buying fancy homes and flying around the world on private jets, etc…So, between that and running my own business (not leaching off my father like some people) and raising a family, I am keeping pretty busy but appreciate your concern, Jordan. We can’t all be as fortunate as you, Jordan. After all, not everybody has a rich daddy like you do who can buy his son air time that he can use to rip off retired women on Social Security every day as you and your father do.

Jordan Sekulow: Remove from list or we’ll do our job. I’ve had enough of this, asked to be removed from this spam many times.

Anyone on this list 1) had a team in Pakistan defending christians against the death penalty 2) had bombs go off at rallies in Kenya because you’re fighting for the life of the unborn? 3) anyone ever been outside the US and seen the battles we’re facing against the pro-abortion establishment and radical islam?

Until you have, don’t criticize those who risk their lives on the front lines for these issues.

Remove me from the list or I take other steps.
Night all.

Me: You’ll “do your job” Jordan?

Yeah, I wish you would Jordan.

Really, I do.

I really wish you would stop lying and deceiving millions of Christians and conservatives by claiming to be “pro-family” “Christians” while portraying the Founding Father of sodomy-based “marriage” and the 50 dollar Romneybort as an authentic pro-family conservative. Will you start doing your job instead of compromising Biblical Truth and lying to millions of Christians?

You still have not answered my questions:

Why did you claim that you never supported the Stupak Amendment when a simple Google Search demonstrates that you and your dad did?

Your dad, Jay Sekulow said of the Stupak Amendment:

“The American Center for Law and Justice, a pro-life legal group, also applauded the vote.

“The passage of this pro-life amendment represents the only bright spot in an otherwise troubling government-run health care package put forth by House Speaker Pelosi,” ACLJ chief counsel Jay Sekulow told LifeNews.com.

“Sekulow gave kudos to Bart Stupak and Joseph Pitts “for their unrelenting efforts in protecting the unborn” but said, “Unfortunately, the leadership in the House has produced a disturbing and flawed health care package that not only fails to meet the needs of most Americans, but interjects an unprecedented level of government intrusion and bureaucracy into health care.”

You and your dad “opposed the Stupak Amendment, Jordan?” Seriously? That’s an outright lie. Do you have any clue what you are talking about?

And how can you criticize ObamaCare’s tax funded abortions when you still support the man who signed 50 dollar elective surgical abortions into law (Mitt Romney)?

Come on Jordan. Have the guts to debate and defend your position instead of threatening to sue or whatever it is you claim “you’ll do” when confronted with uncomfortable truths that reveal your duplicity and hypocrisy.

And by the way, anti-spam laws don’t apply to personal e-mails where you are cc’d. A simple google search would reveal that too.

Be a man and answer the questions asked honestly. Would think a public figure like yourself would not have a problem with that. Or will you only debate when you can control the mic?

Jordan Sekulow: Amendment. Yes. Compromise. No.

Political reality boys and girls - the pro-aborts outnumbered us and we wanted to do what we could to save some unborn lives. We have to work in the real world - you spend your time writing emails to people. Spend some time in the West Bank, Zimbabwe, Kenya (Christians being bombed at EACLJ rallies), and Pakistan

After that, you can comment.

Me: So you admit you knew that Mitt Romney signed $50 dollar abortions into law (2 years after his fake “pro-life conversion) when you went to work for him on his presidential campaign and endorse him for president? You mean it was your understanding Romney wasn’t a “pro-abort?”

And how would have supporting the man whose socialist healthcare plan that served as the model for ObamaCare (Mitt Romney) which subsidized elective surgical abortions on demand, “saved some lives, Jordan?”

Not really getting your warped rationale for working for and supporting the Founding Father of sodomy-based “marriage” and the $50 tax-payer funded abortion, for president of the United States, Mitt Romney…

And again, why did you lie when you said that neither you nor your father supported Stupak when you actually did?

Jordan Sekulow: We’ve been getting death threats, nails in our tires, war declared on us since I was a kid. Live in the trenches for a while boys - then comment

Me: Does “living in the trenches” include lying for pro-abort, pro-homosexual politicians like Romney? and does it include living in 3 mansions and flying around in your dad’s private jet? Sounds tough Jordan.

Jordan Sekulow: That jet has been on aclj tv shows since I was a little kid - never been hidden…As for Romney, Gregg it’s 2010 right? Move on to the next battle - don’t get stuck in the past my friend.

Me: No, Jordan. Romney is the leading GOP candidate in many polls and you and your father played a prominent role in elevating and validating his status. So, his candidacy and your support is still very germane.

So how can you reconcile your criticism of Obamacare’s funding for abortion when you supported the man who signed 50 dollar abortions into law, Mitt Romney?

And why did you falsely claim you and your dad never supported Stupak which would have funded abortions when a simple google search proves otherwise?

Jordan Sekulow: Remove me from the list Gregg. I don’t care about your debate between your friends. Remove me from the list - you spam, you know, remove me. It’s such a joke emailing any “sekulow” email you can to try and reach one of us.

Remove me from the list. I expect a reply by am tomorrow.

Me: Jordan, once again: you are not on any “list.”

I intentionally cc’d you since I cited your father on my recent blog post to provide you with an opportunity to respond.

I can understand why you have no further desire to communicate since you were unable to answer some very direct and I believe fair questions regarding your working and ongoing support for Mitt Romney (and hypocritical criticism of ObamaCare’s abortion subsidies) as well as your false statement made tonight that you (and your father) never supported Stupak when the record clearly reveals you did.

I guess your refusal to candidly discuss these issues is all anybody on this thread needs to know about your character and integrity…

If I have said anything untrue, please bring it to my attention and I will gladly correct the record…

Jordan Sekulow: I don’t want another email from you Gregg - you aren’t worth the time to debate with. If I receive another, I’ll move to other options.

Me: If I continue to press you about why you worked for and still support the Founding Father of sodomy “marriage” and the 50 dollar tax-payer funded abortion, Mitt Romney, for President of the United States, you will “move to other options” Jordan?

Give me a break…Grow up…

How about just answering the question as to why you and your dad (Jay Sekulow) still support the man (Mitt Romney) who…

• Illegally & unconstitutionally instituted sodomy “marriage.”
• Signed $50 tax-subsidized abortions into law (2 years AFTER his fake “pro-life conversion.”)
• Boosted funding for homosexual “education” starting in kindergarten.
• Opposes a ban on homosexual scoutmasters.
• Promised the homosexual Republican “Log Cabin Republicans” he wouldn’t oppose “gay marriage” in return for their endorsement.
• Instituted a quasi-socialist healthcare plan endorsed by Hillary Clinton, Teddy Kennedy and Planned Parenthood that destroyed the Massachusetts’ economy.
• Increased taxes and fees by close to a billion dollars which destroyed the Massachusetts’ economy and opposed the Bush Tax Cuts.
• Voted # 8 RINO by Human Events.
• Passed over Republican lawyers for three quarters of the 36 judicial vacancies he faced and nominated 2 open homosexuals.
• Criticized Joint Chief’s of Staff, Peter Pace for saying that homosexual acts were “immoral.”
• Supports passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act which would force churches and other religious organizations to hire homosexuals and transvestites or face criminal fines and prosecution.

Documented Proof Links here:

And if you can’t answer this simple question, perhaps your dad can. Surely he is never at a loss for words and can defend his continued support for Romney and past support for legislation (Stupak) that would have subsidized the deaths of 1000s of babies in the womb with tax-payer dollars…

Jordan Sekulow: You’re not uncovering anything - the support was public and in mainstream media. Gov Romney would and still could make a great candidate (My emphasis)

Remove me from the list - final email

Me: So Jordan you think that the man who compiled the radical far left wing record Romney did (below) would still make a “great candidate” in the future?

My bad, guy.

I thought you, your dad and ACLJ was actually pro-life, pro-marriage, and pro-limited government.

My bad…

I am sure that millions of Christians will want to know this in a national press release. Thanks for the quote…Now we know where you and your dad stand.

Thanks Jordan…Appreciate your candor…

Jordan Sekulow: You use that line, - my quote - please

Don’t forget, we’ve recently spent time with Governor Palin and other leaders of the grassroots conservative movement

Off of the list by am - this is SPAM

Me: Ok, thanks Jordan.

I will quote you in a national press release as saying that in spite of the fact that Romney illegally instituted sodomy-based “marriage” unilaterally, unconstitutionally and illegally and signed $50 dollar elective surgical abortions on demand into law (2 years AFTER his supposed “pro-life conversion”), (which you have not even attempted to dispute) that you and ACLJ still think that Romney “would and still could make a great candidate.” I am sure that millions of Christians will want to know where you stand. Once again, thanks for your candor.

By the way, here are the SPAM laws and you will see that they don’t apply to our e-mail conversation we are having. So you can save your impotent threats…My lawyer friend shared this with me a few months back when another conterfeit conservative public figure like yourself threatened to sue me for e-mailing him about something he had said on the air…

As it turns out, Jordan, accusing somebody of doing something illegal to a number of 3rd parties without any true basis, as you have done, is libel.

Spam is a legal term with a legal meaning. Anti-Spam Laws concern “commercial messages,” “advertisement or solicitation,” etc. Anti-Spam Laws are to prevent Internet marketing - not freedom of speech.

Truth-telling is still permitted in America … at least for the short-term. Your toothless threat to tattletale is silly. It was probably too much of an inconvenience for you, but a 3-second Internet search on Anti-Spam Laws (see below) makes it clear that I am doing nothing “illegal.”

Unlike what I have written, however, falsely accusing someone of doing something illegal to a number of 3rd parties without any true basis, as you have done Jordan, is libel.

Is your only response to the substantive issues I have raised simply to whine about receiving “spam” e-mails?

Don Hank: Gregg,
If what you say is true, then the whole Sekulow empire is based on a hoax and these people are taking people’s money based on a fraud. I wonder if that is legal? Particularly now that we all are witnesses to the fact that Jordan KNOWS the facts about the Stupak legislation and about Mitt Romney. He certainly can’t say “oh, gosh, Judge, I had no idea I was using false information to make my father’s organization look like it was pro-life. I actually thought Mitt was a real pro-lifer.”
At any rate, it would be good to have a brief article on this, with links etc. However, I know your book will give the details.
This is despicable.
Don

Don Hank: Jordan,
If I recall correctly, I gave money to your rich father believing he was a good man who was sincerely supporting a pro-life platform, among other things. His support for Romney makes me really angry, and also ashamed of myself for being so naïve.
When you say “move on to the next battle,” it seems like you want all of us whom you have conned over the years to forgive and forget.
I can forgive, but if I forget, then I am being irresponsible, because I have a duty to warn others about this scam.
As for the money you took, you really owe a lot of people and should pay it back.
Don Hank
http://laiglesforum.com

This should come as no surprise to anybody who has followed this issue.

Obama was not the first to subsidize elective surgical abortions.

That little honor goes to “conservative” “pro-family” Republican, Mitt Romney who signed $50 elective surgical abortions into law as part of Romneycare (2 years AFTER his supposed “pro-life conversion.”)

And let’s not forget that leading “pro-family” and “pro-life” Christian leaders such as Tony Perkins, Jim Bopp, Richard Land, Jay Sekulow, Mark DeMoss, Tom Minnery and James Dobson and “conservative” pundits such as Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Hugh Hewitt, and Bill Bennett all supported or outright endorsed Mitt Romney for President of the United States.

These so-called conservative and Christian leaders and pundits also encouraged other Christian pro-lifers around the country to support 2 amendments (Stupak and Nelson) which both subsidized selective elective surgical abortions while falsely claiming that both amendments “banned all abortions.”

Many of us begged many of these leaders to fully oppose ObamaCare in toto since the entire bill was totally unconstitutional. None of the organizations above did. And their submission and compromise has led to the current nightmare of a government run healthcare program that subsidizes child murder that we currently face.

You support pro-abortion politicians such as Mitt Romney and you GET MORE abortion.

You support legislation that subsidizes the murder of some children in the womb and you GET MORE tax-subsidized child murder.

We reap what we sow…

Isn’t it time all pro-life Christians and conservatives support full Personhood for all babies in the womb with no exceptions instead of continuing to claim that it’s “not time” as National Right to Life recently claimed?

Abortion: Killing babies is always wrong because God says “thou shalt not murder” and any law contrary to God’s Supreme Law which under-girds the Constitution is no law at all. Shame on so many “pro-life” “Christians” for continually ceding the lie that there is a constitutional right to kill babies and that abortion is the “supreme law of the land” and that in order to end abortion it’s ok to support legislation that regulates and subsidizes it in select circumstances. No “Christian nation” can ever expect God’s blessings when they allow 3,000 innocent defenseless babies to be murdered daily (over 50,000,000 since 1973). The abortion issue is the elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about. But until we recognize the inherent Personhood in every human baby in the womb made in the image of God by God and stop allowing babies to be killed, God’s wrath and Divine Judgment will only increase. If I were president my first official act would be to close down every abortuary in America in compliance with my sworn oath to protect and defend the Supreme Law of the Land which guarantees the inalienable right to life for every American citizen.

“Same-sex marriage”: “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.” Period. Marriage between one man and one woman is God’s standard. Any other variation is contrary to God’s Natural Law and is therefore by definition neither moral nor legal. Whether “pro-family” “conservatives” such as Mitt Romney choose to unilaterally and unconstitutionally issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples still doesn’t change the fact that there is only one definition for marriage: one man and one woman. If I were president I would support a federal marriage amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman and issue an executive order halting the illegal issuance of marriage licenses in Massachusetts and Iowa where no laws have ever been passed to legalize sodomy based “marriages.”

Public Schools: The founder of the N.Y. Humanist Society, C.F. Potter said of tax-payer funded public schools in 1930:

Education is a most powerful ally of Humanism & every American school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, & teaching only a fraction of the children do to stem the tide of a five-day program of Humanistic religion teaching? So very Humanistic is modern education that no religion has a future unless it be Humanism. The religion of tomorrow in America & all the world may not be in all respects identical with the religious Humanism we are advocating in this book, but it will be mightily like it & of the same spirit.”

Indeed, Potter and his colleague John Dewey who founded public education in America have realized their vision. Tax payer dollars have subsidized the religion of Humanism for the last 80 years in violation of the “separation of church and state” liberals are so fond of referencing. Public schools are Humanist indoctrination factories designed to take every ounce of religious (Christian) faith out of children. If elected president I would urge every Christian parent to take their children out of the godless atheistic Marxist Madrassas and would issue an executive order shutting down the Department of Education. Shame on Bush and other “conservative” “Republicans” for increasing funding for public education.

Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro): Obama (until he releases his long form birth certificate showing the hospital in Hawaii he was born in and the doctor who delivered him with the date and time) is in my mind a foreign born rabid Marxist who is illegally occupying the People’s House. No law that he has ever signed is valid since he has not demonstrated that he is constitutionally eligible to be POTUS. Sad that very few “law and order” “conservatives” have demanded Obama prove his natural born citizenship as a full Congressional committee demanded of McCain. As president I would issue executive orders rescinding any legislation he signed into law and have him deported back to his country of origin.

ObamaCare: The entire law is totally unconstitutional and no conservative or Christian or “pro-life” “conservative” should have supported any part of it much less amendments which subsidized select abortions (Nelson and Stupak). Christians and conservatives should have rejected the entire totalitarian Communist monstrosity en toto from the very beginning. No wonder the godless Lefties are winning the Culture War and pushing American into World Government. As president I would immediately issue an executive order rescinding Obamacare in accordance with my constitutional oath to not enforce any laws which are not in accordance with the Supreme Law of the Land.

The Supreme Court: The Founders believed that the Judiciary was by design the “weakest of the 3 branches” since judges were not elected and directly accountable to the sovereign people. Court’s opinions are not law. Only the people possess the constitutional authority to make laws directly via constitutional amendments or citizen initiatives or indirectly via their elected representatives. Any court opinion that is contrary to the Constitution is anti-constitutional and illegal and no judge possesses the right to issue illegal court opinions. The judges who issued Roe, Lawrence, Kelo, Goodridge, California re:marriage, and the Iowa “gay marriage” opinion (to name but a few of the most flagrantly unconstitutional opinions belched forth in the past 40 years), should have all been impeached. Shame on “constitutional conservatives” who perpetuate the lie that courts can make and “strike down” laws. As president I will ignore and reject any opinion issued by the Supreme Court that is contrary to the plain words of the United States Constitution and call for the impeachment of any judges who issue opinions contrary to the Supreme Law of the Land.

Illegal Immigration: Anybody who enters our country illegally should be immediately detained and deported back to their country of origin. Period. Either our federal immigration laws mean something or they don’t. Shame on our so-called “conservative” leaders (Bush, McCain, Romney etc…) who supported McCain-Kennedy “comprehensive immigration reform” which would have given 30 million illegals amnesty. If I were president, every illegal alien in our prisons (almost a third of all federal inmates are illegal aliens) would be deported back to their country of origin and I would have the Hunter border fence constructed within my first 3 months in office.

Islam: Islam is a religion (political system) of pure evil based on the teachings of its rapist, child molesting, murderous founder Muhammad whose primary goal is to establish Sharia Law and a Global Caliphate over the entire world. As president I would deport any Muslim preaching Jihad against America. Let them spew their anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, anti-American garbage elsewhere but not in America.

America: America was founded on Christian principles and it is specifically adherence to those principles which has made our country the greatest nation in the history of the world for over 300 years. The Humanists and atheists who claim otherwise ignore the overwhelming factual evidence to the contrary. If America is to be restored to her former greatness in the 21st Century and saved from the Democrat-Socialists and Globalists who seek to push America into world government, there is only one way to accomplish this task: American Christians must rededicate ourselves and our nation to God. The Founders beleived, “No King but King Jesus.” American Christians by and large have forsaken our First Love. Only Christian reformation and revival can save America at this point. As president I would work to do everything in my power to rededicate our nation back to God.

2. Mr. Romney, you claim that you are opposed to same-sex “marriage.” Why then, as governor, did you claim that the Massachusetts Supreme Court ordered you to issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples when in fact the court themselves, in their majority opinion, admitted that they could not order any of the other two branches to do anything and that if the current marriage law were to be changed to accommodate same-sex “marriages,” that the legislature themselves would have to change the law (which as you know they have STILL never done)? Why do you continue to speciously assert that you had no role in illegally instituting same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts when you were the one who unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally authorized the alterations to and issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples?

3. Mr. Romney, Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council has called you a “friend to the pro-family movement.” And James Dobson has said that you are a “man pro-family voters could support.” Yet, as governor you boosted funding for homosexual education starting in Kindergarten, oppose a ban on homosexual scoutmasters, and support passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act which would force churches and other religious organizations to hire homosexuals and transvestites or face criminal fines and prosecution. Is this a record and positions of somebody who claims to be “pro-family?”

4. Mr. Romney, you claim to be a fiscal conservative. How do you square this claim with the fact that as governor you instituted a quasi-socialist healthcare plan that the Wall St. Journal and Cato Institute have both called a total failure in addition to raising taxes and fees by close to a billion dollars with has destroyed the Massachusetts economy?

5. Mr. Romney, you supported McCain-Feingold “campaign finance reform,” McCain-Kennedy Amnesty, and the majority of McCain-Lieberman Global Warming “Cap and Trade” Bill. Are these conservative positions in your opinion?

The abortion compromisers/regulators such as National Right to Life, Priests for Life, Focus on the Family, American Family Association, Family Research Council, American Center for Law and Justice and “pro-life” “conservative” pundits (Hannity, Limbaugh, Ingraham, Beck, Levin, Coulter, Hewitt, Bennett, Medved, Prager etc…) all support a flawed strategy of regulating abortion by suporting laws which end with “and then you can kill the baby” in spite of the FACT that God’s Enduring Law “Do Not Murder” contains no such “exceptions.”

There is only one way to end the silent genocide in our nation (3,000 plus babies a day murdered in the United States of America or 1.5 million plus babies murdered annually…50,000,000 over the past 25 years!):

Those who claim to be “pro-life” must never compromise by supporting any exceptions or abortions regulations or support any political candidates who do.

Compromise is a loser strategy because it is contrary to God’s unambiguous law, “Do Not Murder.”

And any law that is contrary to God’s law is no law at all.

“Child killing regulations just prune the abortion week and strengthens its root.” Jason Troyer of Colorado Right to Life

If you have not read it yet, I will save you the time. While the group of self-styled “conservatives” talk about the importance of “limited government” and “individual liberty” blah blah blah, the fact is that many of the leading signers listed either directly or indirectly supported the Founding Father of the $50 co-pay abortion and the man who ushered in sodomy-based “marriage” (illegally) to America, Mitt Romney, in the 08′ election.

Where they have the gall to lecture the grassroots on the principles of “constitutional conservatism” is beyond me.

Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council, for example, considers Mitt Romney to be a “friend to the pro-family movement,” has taken $ from Romney surrogates, and featured Romney a few months ago at his “Values Voters Summit.” (for the 3rd year in a row) in spite of the FACT that I possess a plethora of evidence which demonstrates that Mr. Perkins has been intimately aware of Mitt Romney’s fully documented far left wing social and fiscal record for quite some time.

Wendy Wright, the President of Concerned Women of America, actually has an autographed chair in her office in Washington D.C. that I sat in a few years ago (unknowingly until the end of our hour long conversation when she pointed it out to me) that she accepted as a gift from Mitt Romney in spite of the fact that she too was intimately aware of Mitt Romney’s far left wing social and fiscal record (that we discussed in her office that day).

David Keene, President of the American Conservative Union, has featured Mitt Romney 3 years in a row at Keene’s, “Conservative Political Action Conference” in Washington D.C. and has worked behind the scenes with other prominent “conservative” leaders to keep Romney’s name alive and viable for the 2012 election. Keene is also featuring Romney prominently this year at CPAC as a keynote speaker in spite of the fact that I possess a multitude of evidence that Keene too has been intimately aware of Mitt Romney’s far left wing social and fiscal record since Keene had me emcee the presidential sessions two years in a row at his event.

Ed Feulner, the President of the “conservative” Heritage Foundation has also featured Mr. Romney prominently in many of Heritage’s fundrasing efforts and has portrayed Romney as a Reaganesque conservative in spite of the fact that Mr. Feulner surely has done his homework and is intimately aware of Mitt Romney’s far left-wing social and fiscal record.

Kathryn Lopez of National Review also endorsed Romney for president and is still a staunch supporter despite the fact that I have the evidence that Ms. Lopez of National Review who endorsed “conservative” Mitt for President knows Romney’s entire far left wing social and fiscal record and has gone to great lengths to white-wash and suppress it in her regular nationally syndicated columns.

This so-called “statement of conservative values and beliefs” is merely more hot air from a bunch of self-important hypocritical and compromised inside the belt-way pseudo-conservative elite power brokers who have yet to realize how totally disconnected they really are from the true conservative grassroots base who actually believes in much of what the document purports to champion.